Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Biden Turns Down Interview with Chris Wallace (Original Post) babylonsister Jul 2020 OP
His decision. Chris Wallace is Fuck Youz. LakeArenal Jul 2020 #1
Maybe later? pwb Jul 2020 #2
Or never... Blue Owl Jul 2020 #8
I vote never. Laelth Jul 2020 #13
I agree. Wallace is under heat to flame Biden--no benefit on catering to the Russian First Network. TheBlackAdder Jul 2020 #25
Pretty sure Trump's enablers came down hard on Wallace after agingdem Jul 2020 #26
No political upside. House of Roberts Jul 2020 #3
Good! No fux news interviews. They will just later twist and distort what he said Thekaspervote Jul 2020 #4
THIS malaise Jul 2020 #9
And you just know that Tara Reid person will just happen to come up. brush Jul 2020 #22
Would be curious to hear the reason... Wounded Bear Jul 2020 #5
It's Fox. That's it's own reason. ananda Jul 2020 #15
Smart, I think. Faux News will "both sides" it Happy Hoosier Jul 2020 #6
+1 uponit7771 Jul 2020 #10
Smart. Wallace May be a cut above FoxSnooz personalities, he is still associated with a lying, Ninga Jul 2020 #7
i believe it's a good decision RT Atlanta Jul 2020 #11
I'd rather he appear than not, but I can't say it's a mistake to refuse. I think he'd do well. Hoyt Jul 2020 #12
He should agree to an interview with Wallace-- Kingofalldems Jul 2020 #14
IDK if that's a great comparison democrattotheend Jul 2020 #16
There is no comparison between Rachel and Hannity. Kingofalldems Jul 2020 #19
I'd like to know the specific reason ScratchCat Jul 2020 #17
He can do it when drumpf releases his taxes and grades soothsayer Jul 2020 #18
Who knows.. CentralMass Jul 2020 #20
There's no reason to legitimize Fox, Wallace or no Wallace. crickets Jul 2020 #21
He's only going to speak to journalists. Chris Wallace is an actor. dreamland Jul 2020 #23
Only if Biden gets the same deal Trump gets. Chris has too submit the Qs in advance, NCjack Jul 2020 #24
He absolutely should. HotTeaBag Jul 2020 #27
I'm sure Biden will allow it, eventually RussBLib Jul 2020 #28

TheBlackAdder

(28,195 posts)
25. I agree. Wallace is under heat to flame Biden--no benefit on catering to the Russian First Network.
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 12:02 PM
Jul 2020

agingdem

(7,849 posts)
26. Pretty sure Trump's enablers came down hard on Wallace after
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 12:31 PM
Jul 2020

the Stable Genius Shit Show...so now Wallace is "obligated" to do onto Joe what he did onto the orange maggot...and Joe said no...I'm thinking Joe subscribes to the "you don't murder someone (Trump) while they're committing suicide" school of political thought

brush

(53,778 posts)
22. And you just know that Tara Reid person will just happen to come up.
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 11:56 AM
Jul 2020

Biden is running a great campaign so far. I agree with his decision. When trump does an equivalent interview, like say on Rachel Maddow, maybe then.

Happy Hoosier

(7,308 posts)
6. Smart, I think. Faux News will "both sides" it
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 10:59 AM
Jul 2020

Faux news will want to seem "even handed," so no doubt lots of questions about Hunter Biden, "Obamagate" and even Tara Reid. Nothing to be gained, IMO.

Ninga

(8,275 posts)
7. Smart. Wallace May be a cut above FoxSnooz personalities, he is still associated with a lying,
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 10:59 AM
Jul 2020

Trumpian supporting, Fauci denagrating, network.

Biden doesn’t need them.

RT Atlanta

(2,517 posts)
11. i believe it's a good decision
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 11:04 AM
Jul 2020

fox is not a legitimate news org, though they do have several credible reporters like Chris Wallace.

this does nothing for Joe with the mouth-breathing audience that watches them - they're voting for kkk-don no matter what.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
12. I'd rather he appear than not, but I can't say it's a mistake to refuse. I think he'd do well.
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 11:06 AM
Jul 2020

I definitely wouldn't want him to appear with Hannity, Carlson, etc., and doubt even the most ardent trumpster would.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
16. IDK if that's a great comparison
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 11:26 AM
Jul 2020

Chris Wallace, from what I understand, is one of the fairer journalists on Fox. Isn't he known for asking tough questions of everyone?

Trump going on Rachel would be more like Biden going on Hannity.

ScratchCat

(1,990 posts)
17. I'd like to know the specific reason
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 11:27 AM
Jul 2020

Like maybe he will do it later.

For starters, If I were Joe, I'd tell them that "Hunter Biden", "Obamagate" and "Tara Reid" are fake stories that will not be addressed. If they want to talk about real stuff, fine. Otherwise, nevermind.

NCjack

(10,279 posts)
24. Only if Biden gets the same deal Trump gets. Chris has too submit the Qs in advance,
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 11:57 AM
Jul 2020

and Biden gets to reject the ones that he doesn't want to be asked.

 

HotTeaBag

(1,206 posts)
27. He absolutely should.
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 12:43 PM
Jul 2020

It would be a great way to reach Trump's 'soft' Republican support.

The people that would tune in to see an interview with Wallace aren't the same that slavishly watch Ingrahm, Hannity and Carlson - it would be a great opportunity to counter so many of the current talking points about him (that he's controlled by the Left-wing radicals, wants to defund the police, etc.).

By turning down the interview they'll have a new talking point - that he's scared - Bernie did it, as did Buttigieg.

Wallace would probably conduct the fairest interview that he could expect from any Right-leaning media outlet.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Biden Turns Down Intervie...