General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBiden Turns Down Interview with Chris Wallace
Smart or not?
https://politicalwire.com/2020/07/28/biden-turns-down-interview-with-chris-wallace/
Biden Turns Down Interview with Chris Wallace
July 28, 2020 at 10:43 am EDT By Taegan Goddard
LakeArenal
(28,817 posts)pwb
(11,265 posts)I agree with him.
n/t
Laelth
(32,017 posts)Biden doesnt have to do anything at this point.
-Laelth
TheBlackAdder
(28,195 posts)agingdem
(7,849 posts)the Stable Genius Shit Show...so now Wallace is "obligated" to do onto Joe what he did onto the orange maggot...and Joe said no...I'm thinking Joe subscribes to the "you don't murder someone (Trump) while they're committing suicide" school of political thought
House of Roberts
(5,169 posts)Would anyone really think he could gain voters from the Fox audience?
Thekaspervote
(32,767 posts)malaise
(268,998 posts)Not after years of GOP propaganda
brush
(53,778 posts)Biden is running a great campaign so far. I agree with his decision. When trump does an equivalent interview, like say on Rachel Maddow, maybe then.
Wounded Bear
(58,656 posts)otherwise...
ananda
(28,860 posts)Don't give them airtime, ratings, or anything else.
Happy Hoosier
(7,308 posts)Faux news will want to seem "even handed," so no doubt lots of questions about Hunter Biden, "Obamagate" and even Tara Reid. Nothing to be gained, IMO.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Ninga
(8,275 posts)Trumpian supporting, Fauci denagrating, network.
Biden doesnt need them.
RT Atlanta
(2,517 posts)fox is not a legitimate news org, though they do have several credible reporters like Chris Wallace.
this does nothing for Joe with the mouth-breathing audience that watches them - they're voting for kkk-don no matter what.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)I definitely wouldn't want him to appear with Hannity, Carlson, etc., and doubt even the most ardent trumpster would.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)when Trump agrees to an interview with Rachel Maddow.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Chris Wallace, from what I understand, is one of the fairer journalists on Fox. Isn't he known for asking tough questions of everyone?
Trump going on Rachel would be more like Biden going on Hannity.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)One lies, one is truthful.
ScratchCat
(1,990 posts)Like maybe he will do it later.
For starters, If I were Joe, I'd tell them that "Hunter Biden", "Obamagate" and "Tara Reid" are fake stories that will not be addressed. If they want to talk about real stuff, fine. Otherwise, nevermind.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)crickets
(25,980 posts)It is NOT a news organization.
dreamland
(964 posts)NCjack
(10,279 posts)and Biden gets to reject the ones that he doesn't want to be asked.
HotTeaBag
(1,206 posts)It would be a great way to reach Trump's 'soft' Republican support.
The people that would tune in to see an interview with Wallace aren't the same that slavishly watch Ingrahm, Hannity and Carlson - it would be a great opportunity to counter so many of the current talking points about him (that he's controlled by the Left-wing radicals, wants to defund the police, etc.).
By turning down the interview they'll have a new talking point - that he's scared - Bernie did it, as did Buttigieg.
Wallace would probably conduct the fairest interview that he could expect from any Right-leaning media outlet.
RussBLib
(9,008 posts)Timing is everything.