TRUMP COMES UP EMPTY WHEN PRESSED FOR EVIDENCE OF ELECTION FRAUD IN COURT
In both the the Texas voter id and the Kobach proof of citizenship needed to register to vote the cases, the GOP could provide no evidence of voter fraud in the real world. In the Penn , trump is suing to block vote by mail and the court asked for proof of voter fraud. Guess what happen
Link to tweet
The campaign is suing Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar and each of the state’s county election boards to prevent election administrators from providing secure drop boxes for mail-in ballot returns. These drop boxes allow voters to return their mail-in ballots by hand, without sending them through the postal system and risking delays. The Trump campaign alleges that the practice “provides fraudsters an easy opportunity to engage in ballot harvesting, manipulate or destroy ballots, manufacture duplicitous votes, and sow chaos.”
In a motion last week, Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future and the Sierra Club called on the Trump campaign to provide evidence of the existence of voter fraud, arguing that the campaign’s lawsuit was “replete with salacious allegations and dire warnings” about Pennsylvania’s elections and that they “must either be compelled to provide discovery concerning their fraud-based allegations or be precluded from pursuing these claims going forward.” Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan granted the motion, ordering the campaign to “produce such evidence in their possession, and if they have none, state as much.”
The response provided by the Trump campaign to the opposing counsel, which was shared with The Intercept and Type Investigations, contains a few scant examples of election fraud — but none of the instances in the 524-page discovery document involved mail-in ballots.
“Not only did the campaign fail to provide evidence that voter fraud was a widespread problem in Pennsylvania, they failed to provide any evidence that any misconduct occurred in the primary election or that so-called voter fraud is any sort of regular problem in Pennsylvania,” said Suzanne Almeida, interim director of Common Cause PA, one of the parties in the lawsuit. The Trump campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment for this story.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Lying like shitheads.
(and it didn't even cost him $130,000.00!!!!!!)
Just ask Stormy! 
That's probably because Trump wasn't in the courtroom and couldn't impress the judge with his incredibly YUGE brain!
Fertilizer Factory with an endless supply of crap. 
of Trump voters getting caught and using the excuse of "testing the system"
you know that "some people" is a lot stronger argument than just "people" say.
They knew going in they didn't have any evidence, but they went ahead with this frivolous lawsuit anyway. 
That's been Trump's modus operandi his entire life, tying things up in court for years until the plaintiff just gives up. Fucking conman.
Apparently the judge reads with electric lighting.
I was honestly shocked last year when I found out the GOP-controlled state legislature actually passed a law authorizing it and setting it up.
I had participated in multiple "virtual" town halls with my own Dem State Senator for several years before that happened and would always ask him about whether there were ever any election reforms like "early voting" even being considered. I didn't even broach something like vote by mail, since although we did have mail-in absentee ballots, something like that always required a specific set of reasons to qualify (I used to absentee vote when I was in college for example).
But we know their go-to tried and true tactic is always to stall and delay by tying stuff up in court. 
