General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOMG! Biden is TANKING in the betting markets!
It's obvious that MICHAEL BLOOMBERG is going to be our nominee...
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2020/2/14/21137882/prediction-markets-bloomberg-sanders-president
The things people find to worry about here.....
cos dem
(903 posts)Eyeball_Kid
(7,432 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)...and that it was clear the bettors feel the unrest is hurting him. He went from +21 to +8 in a matter of days. It's back to +12 for him but he's lost ground in Wisconsin - tho, still leads.
The point wasn't to freak out but to show an alternate view. It's funny how everyone got excited over the betting markets two months ago when Biden surged ahead of Trump and now dismiss 'em because it's tightening.
But even I said the next round of polls would likely define the markets. If Biden kept a strong lead nationally, the markets would rebound.
R B Garr
(16,953 posts)it was evident from Trumps own convention last week being almost exclusively about the protests, which he calls riots because he thinks it benefits him politically.
All the Sunday shows were talking about Trumps dwelling on the riots because he thinks it helps him politically. Schiff said the same thing. Your correlation matched what has been very evident.
stopdiggin
(11,306 posts)And if the Sunday morning talks, and the betting markets are reflecting that -- that's just what they're doing, reflecting.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Bernie was a heavy favorite when the national polls was in his favor. First they had Sanders winning all 50 states than shortly after Biden was winning the Southeast before South Carolina primary. Around that time and around or after Super Tuesday the national polling flipped to Biden and so did PredictIt. After Michigan Hillary Clinton was a bigger favorite than Bernie Sanders to win the nomination.
Also last I checked PredictIt has Biden winning the Presidential race.
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)Month after month. Year after year.
Then check the odds on that prop at the betting sites, parallel to when each assertion was made here
Polybius
(15,411 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)Crawford, and he predicted stocks and the market using astrology
I wonder how many people followed his advice
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)awesomerwb1
(4,268 posts)agingdem
(7,849 posts)I know this particular election is literally a once in a life time..I know the stakes are high but can we just once go into this with something resembling a "we've got this" attitude instead of OMG some bookie in Britain declares Biden is tanking? ...and OMG Trump beat Biden to Kenosha!..and OMG why the hell isn't Biden in Portland?...we get out the vote and we win...concentrate!!
BGBD
(3,282 posts)are terrible. They are not predictive. They are completely reactionary and often was out of proportion to what anything would suggest they should be.
Ignore them.
Thekaspervote
(32,765 posts)closely follow the polls. It takes some time for them to adjust, and this is that adjustment. It took a long time for them to show Biden pulling ahead of Trump long after Biden was having comfortable double digit leads.
Slowly turning an ocean liner!!
DavidDvorkin
(19,477 posts)Sometimes, Predictic reacts strongly to some event or poll, but it usually corrects itself after a bit.
Dan
(3,561 posts)That within 3 years - it wont be safe to walk the streets, white or black.
Sogo
(4,986 posts)is like saying the stock market is a reflection of the economy.
Markets have their own dynamic unrelated to politics or the economy (although the stock market used to track the economy more closely than it does now).
Cicada
(4,533 posts)Polls can be wrong. So can betting markets. But both have some accuracy, in the past.
538 Model probably has some accuracy. Same with the Economist model.
I would take the average of all of them.
MFM008
(19,808 posts)This election.
Not polls
Not betting.
Nothing.
Just a huge wave of dissatisfied customers
Against Grover and his enablers.