Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

catbyte

(34,382 posts)
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 01:49 PM Sep 2020

Well, this Nate Silver chart punctuates the importance of GOTV.



Chance of a Biden Electoral college win if he wins the popular vote by X points:

0-1 points: just 6%!
1-2 points: 22%
2-3 points: 46%
3-4 points: 74%
4-5 points: 89%
5-6 points: 98%
6-7 points: 99%
12:11 PM · Sep 2, 2020
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Midnight Writer

(21,760 posts)
3. It's not just the Electoral College we need to crush. We need to overcome gerrymanders down ticket.
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 02:05 PM
Sep 2020

The best thing for our country is a huge turnout of voters.

Time to clean house.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
5. Yes, but this portion of the discussion is truly fuel for nightmares...
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 02:16 PM
Sep 2020

?s=20

Discussing leads in CA, MA, NY that far outstrip Obama's wins. Piling on in these huge blue states doesn't help in the EC battle, unfortunately.
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
8. This is a weird take when it literally gives Biden a 99% chance if he wins by that much.
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 02:56 PM
Sep 2020

I'm starting to think some of you really do want to lose. You're really getting nightmare fuel out of something that has a 1% chance of happening?

MANative

(4,112 posts)
9. Seriously?
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 03:00 PM
Sep 2020

Read all of Nate's analysis on this. It's terrifying. Joe can have that 7 point lead in head-to-head polls, but because the margin is so huge in the big blue states, it doesn't translate to winning the swing states needed to get over the EC hurdle. Many swing state polls are still much closer than I'd like them to be, especially in the larger states like FL and TX where we could get a bigger chunk of the EC votes. 10 from MN is not going to cut it.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
13. Seriously?
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 03:02 PM
Sep 2020

Are you just purposely ignoring Nate's initial tweet where Biden winning by 7% gives him a 99% chance of winning the EC?

If you're going to dwell on something that has a one-percent chance of happening, do it in private.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
15. The tweet referenced here was a follow up to his original.
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 03:04 PM
Sep 2020

That suggests to me that it's a disclaimer, at least. My opinion is just as valid as any other poster's.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
16. There's no point in putting a disclaimer on something that has a 1% chance of happening
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 03:09 PM
Sep 2020

And there's no point in worrying over something that crazy. 99% chance is pretty fucking good in my book.

BannonsLiver

(16,384 posts)
10. Except that's not how national polls are conducted
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 03:00 PM
Sep 2020

They’re not weighted disproportionately toward blue states, as you suggest.

MANative

(4,112 posts)
14. Not my personal statistical conclusion. It's Nate's and he knows a heck of a lot more than ...
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 03:03 PM
Sep 2020

most of us do about polling and statistics. Not saying he's infallible, by any stretch, but it's not nothing, either.

Thekaspervote

(32,765 posts)
6. Look at the Economist polling. Nate Silver is no longer doing unbiased polling!!
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 02:49 PM
Sep 2020

Remember the dem primary? After 2 caucus nights silver calls it for sanders winning 49 states, despite sanders vote count being down 15% from 16 and no youth vote!

Silver wants a horse race too...keeps the money coming in as you return again and again to his site.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
7. Also please realize just because Biden is at 46% doesn't mean Trump is the favorite.
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 02:53 PM
Sep 2020

46% chance would still likely be significantly larger than Trump's chance of winning if Biden won the popular vote by that amount.

 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
12. I remember this chart from 2016
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 03:01 PM
Sep 2020

Hillary was <1% at 0-1, if I remember correctly. I remember seeing that and being numbed.

The national polls are very helpful but like a pointspread in betting. The spread is essentially -3.5. Trump is closer to a back door cover than it appears.

However, this should serve to dispel the nonsense that Trump could win the national vote by huge margin and still squeak out the electoral college. It is clear that 5 points is extraordinarily safe. But that 5 points won't be evident early on election night. Trump will be leading the popular vote. The big numbers don't come later until the West and particularly California are heard from.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
17. I believe Hillary's final vote margin was 2.09% more overall votes
Wed Sep 2, 2020, 03:14 PM
Sep 2020

a bump up to even 3% would almost certainly be a win for Biden


And Kaine was not much of a charismatic running mate, imho


Kamala is kick-ass and an amazing addition to the ticket!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Well, this Nate Silver ch...