General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's Dirty Tricks
BERLIN With November approaching, I am becoming ever more nervous about the US presidential election. While my American friends focus on Joe Bidens lead over current president Donald Trump in opinion polls, believing deeply in US democracys capacity for self-renewal, my own perspective as a British citizen and think-tank director has me worried.
As a Briton, I can remember watching a 20-point polling lead for Remain become a victory for Leave in the Brexit referendum four years ago. And as a think-tank director, I work closely with scholars who study how authoritarian leaders manipulate democratic systems to stay in power, as has happened in Turkey, Russia, Hungary, and Poland. In fact, it often seems as though Trump has studied the tactics pioneered by other aspiring strongmen more closely than anyone. Based on recent conversations with experts on each of these countries, I have compiled the following catalogue of dirty tricks that Trump seems to borrowing.
The first is the weaponization of history. Populist leaders promote their political platforms through polarization and social division. They do not mind alienating and insulting some voters if doing so will energize their own base. By posturing as the champions of national greatness, they want to determine who counts as authentic citizens and who does not. This practice inevitably brings history to the fore.
Whether it is Russian President Vladimir Putin invoking the Soviet victory in World War II, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan harking back to the Ottoman Empire, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán fixating on the Treaty of Trianon, or British Prime Minister Boris Johnson looking back to Pax Britannica, each leader has advanced a highly partisan historical narrative.
Another, related approach is what might be called post-truth politics. These leaders prefer direct communication with voters through professional propaganda videos and social media, because this allows them to dismiss inconvenient facts offered by experts. In this media ecosystem, fact-checking has little purchase, because the people who need to hear it are not listening, or refuse to believe anything the liberal media says. In many democracies, fake news is now most common at the local level, where political operatives have filled the vacuum left by the decline of traditional city and regional outlets.
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-authoritarian-dirty-tricks-election-subterfuge-by-mark-leonard-2020-08
empedocles
(15,751 posts)pandr32
(11,583 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Dirtbag donnie has a nice ring to it!
SWBTATTReg
(22,124 posts)in fact, not reporting on valid news, but instead, trying to prime the pump for more clicks, thus more pay?
Any article that begins w/ the words such as "I'm worried, I'm nervous, I'm this, I'm that, etc.", go away, and go elsewhere to be the boogieman elsewhere.
There are thousands of such articles out there, analyzing this, analyzing that, etc. to the point of being redundant, ridiculous, unrealistic, and unfounded.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Blue Owl
(50,365 posts)Trump needs to go. NOW. Can't wait until November.