General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHoward Dean's view of Facebook
Link to tweet
Text:
Facebook needs to be shut down. They are a clear and parent Danger to the United States and to people all over the world ( Rohingya, Jews, African Americans, US soldiers, women all over the world).
He replied to himself to correct: parent --> present
cyclonefence
(4,483 posts)but how in hell anyone could retain a FB account after what they did in 2016 and continue to do now is beyond me. I think it's a patriotic duty to get off FB and find some other way to interact with family and friends.
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)Maven
(10,533 posts)Not really.
There are plenty of other ways to keep in touch with loved ones electronically that don't involve participating in Zuckerberg's right wing social engineering platform.
JI7
(89,247 posts)I never had Facebook do maybe im missing something.
Yeehah
(4,585 posts)Some people react like it's the only communication platform in the universe.
we can do it
(12,182 posts)we can do it
(12,182 posts)KPN
(15,642 posts)was a neat idea that has gone bad. I agree with Howard Dean. Its benefits fall way too far short of its costs to a stable, balanced and equitable for all society. Shut it down.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)What should they use instead of Facebook?
Blecht
(3,803 posts)And the Völkischer Beobachter before that.
gristy
(10,667 posts)google how to make a website for free
we can do it
(12,182 posts)msongs
(67,395 posts)rockfordfile
(8,702 posts)Maven
(10,533 posts)JustGene
(421 posts)This was done to AT&T more than once.
Monopolies are bad, we (should) know this by now.
JI7
(89,247 posts)violent scumbag use it to carry out violent acts and not doing anything to stop it.
It's not really an issue of competition or prices.
JustGene
(421 posts)and force competition by dividing control.
This is software, not too hard to do.
I would wager they already have a plan for this.
Why else invite regulation?
This would kill the co. if done on it's own.(investors)
Not so if forced.
As a whole where is the competition?
I don't see it, It should be there.
Prices and value are different words for the same thing.(wrongly)
FB may be a new form of monopoly, but can be dealt with.
*sorry about the rant, I hate FB
JI7
(89,247 posts)There was myspace . And people can create their own websites.
Again, the problem doesn't seem to be one of competition .
The key is financial competition not technical.
I can't see any viable competition there.
Some monopolies happen naturally, this looks like one.
Stuck between fiduciary and social responsibility.
The importance of the function of a business is also important.
At&T went from luxury to utility.
Ford went fom curiosity to (almost) necessity.
JI7
(89,247 posts)an interface for:
News
Messaging
Sharing
Advertising
Seperate companies doesn't mean they can't still function.
When they say it's too hard this is baloney.
One Co. as network
one as adverts
one as news aggregator
one as whatever
regulate the ownership & interaction
As I said they likely have a plan for this, make em do it
Nobody loses any work or value.
Just a bit of profit at the top.
KatyaR
(3,445 posts)The nonprofit I work for would, but not me.
crickets
(25,962 posts)DFW
(54,341 posts)If "parent" wasn't corrected to "present," then it wasn't really Howard. He knows English, and never deliberately posts anything in Republicanese.
kentuck
(111,079 posts)Would that be better?
I doubt that many Trump supporters would give it up?
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)Seems maybe self awareness isn't a thing any more.