Op-Ed: Why the 2020 election will be decided in suburbia
American politics is increasingly about dueling geographies. Democrats have become the party of the nations cities, while the Republican Party finds its base in rural, small town and low-density exurban America, places of less extreme class divisions than the big cities, but also with less diversity and a smaller share of the population.
Yet the political fulcrum of 2020 wont be found in these competing universes but in suburbia.
Since 2012, suburbs and exurbs account for about 90% of all metropolitan-area growth. Home to over 80% of residents of the nations 53 largest metro areas, the suburbs have nearly half of all voters. Florida has long been the ultimate swing state. As one political analyst put it: Suburbs are the new Florida.
In recent years, both cities and rural areas have become more politically monolithic. In 2008, Barack Obama won nearly one quarter of the countrys non-metro counties. Eight years later, Hillary Clinton won barely 10%.
At the same time, voters in big cities have become more rigidly Democratic. In 1984, for example, Ronald Reagan won 31% of the vote in San Francisco and 27.4% in Manhattan. In 2016, Donald Trump won only 10% of the vote in San Francisco and Manhattan.
In sharp contrast, suburban areas remain remarkably well-divided. For the past 20 years the Republican-leaning suburban voters have held steady at 47%, with Democratic leaners at 45%. Successful presidential candidates need to win the suburbs. In 2008, Obama, with many suburbanites under water from the financial crisis, won the suburban vote and the election.
https://news.yahoo.com/op-ed-why-2020-election-110050108.html