Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"How is that not, at it's core, an abject portrayal of the public trust?"
Not the sort of question the WH Press Secretary usually has to answer.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 453 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"How is that not, at it's core, an abject portrayal of the public trust?" (Original Post)
brooklynite
Sep 2020
OP
Bettie
(16,072 posts)1. Did she actually answer it?
Because I can't see her having an answer.
unblock
(52,118 posts)2. I presume the answer was "why thank you for such high praise!"
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,594 posts)3. Betrayal, not portrayal?
elleng
(130,732 posts)4. 'BEtrayal?'
unblock
(52,118 posts)5. Betrayal, I'm guessing?
Maru Kitteh
(28,314 posts)6. me thinks ya mean betrayal
czarjak
(11,253 posts)7. Portrayal of betrayal?