Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"How is that not, at it's core, an abject portrayal of the public trust?"
Not the sort of question the WH Press Secretary usually has to answer.
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"How is that not, at it's core, an abject portrayal of the public trust?" (Original Post)
brooklynite
Sep 2020
OP
Bettie
(19,446 posts)1. Did she actually answer it?
Because I can't see her having an answer.
unblock
(56,078 posts)2. I presume the answer was "why thank you for such high praise!"
The Velveteen Ocelot
(129,730 posts)3. Betrayal, not portrayal?
elleng
(141,926 posts)4. 'BEtrayal?'
unblock
(56,078 posts)5. Betrayal, I'm guessing?
Maru Kitteh
(31,392 posts)6. me thinks ya mean betrayal
czarjak
(13,512 posts)7. Portrayal of betrayal?
