Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBob Woodward Knew Karl Rove Was A Valerie Plame Leaker And Withheld The Info To Help Bush in 2004
He later apologized.
A journalist sitting on explosive information right before an election to help one candidate is not a journalist.
Woodward just wants to sell books, and doesn't give a damn about journalism, or or democracy, much less truth or justice.
He is a total and complete fraud.
I wouldn't buy his book to burn.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 974 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bob Woodward Knew Karl Rove Was A Valerie Plame Leaker And Withheld The Info To Help Bush in 2004 (Original Post)
DanieRains
Sep 2020
OP
hedda_foil
(16,373 posts)1. I've never heard this and I've been here since 2001. A link or three to this claim would be helpful
Spazito
(50,326 posts)2. LOL
Actually he has released the "explosive information" just in time this time. I can't help laugh at those who vow to not buy the book as if that makes one iota of difference. It doesn't.
BannonsLiver
(16,370 posts)3. Remind me again why I'm supposed to care about the 2004 election in 2020?
DanieRains
(4,619 posts)5. It Has To Do With Journalism
And history.
And context.
And truth, we will rarely hear.
BannonsLiver
(16,370 posts)7. So nothing, then.
Thanks for the clarification.
And on edit:History...you mean like - checks notes - Watergate?
msongs
(67,401 posts)4. quite a few book peddlers these days making $$ for their selfish selves nt
Trumpocalypse
(6,143 posts)6. He's a Republican
What do you expect?