Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 03:54 PM Sep 2020

Republicans achieve massive voter suppression in Florida, ex-felons cannot vote right now

Florida can bar ex-felons from voting if they owe court payments, appeals court rules

https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/11/politics/florida-ex-felons-voting/index.html


Florida can bar ex-felons from voting if they owe court fines or fees associated with their convictions, even if they are unable to pay, a federal appeals court ruled Friday.

The 6-4 ruling by the full 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court's ruling blocking the law.

The law, Chief Judge William Pryor wrote in the majority opinion, doesn't constitute a poll tax. Instead, "it promotes full rehabilitation of returning citizens and ensures full satisfaction of the punishment imposed for the crimes by which felons forfeited the right to vote."

"That criminal sentences often include financial obligations does not make this requirement a 'capricious or irrelevant factor,'" Pryor wrote. "Monetary provisions of a sentence are no less a part of the penalty that society imposes for a crime than terms of imprisonment. Indeed, some felons face substantial monetary penalties but little or no prison time."


eta: law is here http://laws.flrules.org/2019/162 , looking for better source
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans achieve massive voter suppression in Florida, ex-felons cannot vote right now (Original Post) steve2470 Sep 2020 OP
So, other than having to serve in prison (if a term was enacted), pay penalties, and also enact SWBTATTReg Sep 2020 #1
Well, the rapists, murders, and child molesters will gravitate to the Republicans, of course. Aristus Sep 2020 #2
How true, and the rest of the convicts are probably republicans that committed some sort of... SWBTATTReg Sep 2020 #4
ex-felons tend to be Democratic overwhelmingly steve2470 Sep 2020 #3
Really. Was there an analysis of backgrounds, etc. done? I did not know this, and was wondering... SWBTATTReg Sep 2020 #6
Kushner is full of shit steve2470 Sep 2020 #7
You do make sense w/ your logic, but I don't think it's that clear cut and dried to the fact that... SWBTATTReg Sep 2020 #17
well, of course it's not 100% Democratic steve2470 Sep 2020 #19
I'm not doing the research, I do trust you and your facts. Surprised? I simply just voiced a SWBTATTReg Sep 2020 #20
just another recipe for horrible governance. institutional racism. unblock Sep 2020 #5
How come "who can vote" in a federal election is a states rights decision? AnnaLee Sep 2020 #8
presidential elections are all done at the state level, so state laws come into play steve2470 Sep 2020 #10
There are no national elections in the United States. nt. Mariana Sep 2020 #15
This is where Bloomberg can put his money to the best use Arazi Sep 2020 #9
agreed! nt steve2470 Sep 2020 #11
A big part of the problem is that Florida can't tell many of them what they owe. sl8 Sep 2020 #14
excellent point, yes nt steve2470 Sep 2020 #16
Decision (PDF): sl8 Sep 2020 #12
thanks! nt steve2470 Sep 2020 #13
MFers spanone Sep 2020 #18
Near universal condemnation from legal Twitter Arazi Sep 2020 #21
totally agree... the ex-felons could pay off their fines AND vote steve2470 Sep 2020 #22

SWBTATTReg

(22,059 posts)
1. So, other than having to serve in prison (if a term was enacted), pay penalties, and also enact
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:05 PM
Sep 2020

voter restrictions if unable to pay? 3 different things? I'm guessing that these EX-felons might as well move to another state, so they can vote immediately?

Also, what's the impact of this, X % are democratic voters, Y % are republican voters?

Aristus

(66,275 posts)
2. Well, the rapists, murders, and child molesters will gravitate to the Republicans, of course.
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:09 PM
Sep 2020

I don't want their votes.

SWBTATTReg

(22,059 posts)
4. How true, and the rest of the convicts are probably republicans that committed some sort of...
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:13 PM
Sep 2020

financial crimes, all republicans of course too!

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
3. ex-felons tend to be Democratic overwhelmingly
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:12 PM
Sep 2020

That's why the Republican governor and legislature passed that law.

SWBTATTReg

(22,059 posts)
6. Really. Was there an analysis of backgrounds, etc. done? I did not know this, and was wondering...
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:19 PM
Sep 2020

where this tidbit of news came from? I did find this below, in a quick google search, the source is attributed to Jared Kishner (of all people, yikes)...

As President Donald Trump builds the Republican Party’s coalition before the 2020 election, his son-in-law Jared Kushner tossed out a surprising statistic about a group of people who he said leans right: felons in Florida.

"In Florida they passed a law where former felons can now vote. We've had more ex-felons register as Republicans than Democrats," Kushner told Laura Ingraham on Fox News April 1.

Ingraham interjected: "Wait, whoa, whoa. You've had more felons, ex-felons register as Republicans than Democrats?"

Kushner replied: "That's the data that I've seen. I think that will surprise a lot of people when they see the new coalition that President Trump is building for what the Republican Party has the potential to be."

So are former felons rushing to join Trump’s party in Florida?

We found no statewide data to support Kushner’s conclusion that more ex-felons have registered as Republicans since a new law took effect. At this point in time, his comment isn’t more than wishful thinking.

We contacted the White House to ask for Kushner’s data and did not get a reply.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
7. Kushner is full of shit
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:21 PM
Sep 2020

Probably a large majority of ex-felons are African-American, who tend to vote Democratic in huge majorities.

I could find the research, but think of it: If they voted REPUBLICAN, why would a Republican governor and a Republican-controlled legislature pass that law ? It makes no sense any other way.

SWBTATTReg

(22,059 posts)
17. You do make sense w/ your logic, but I don't think it's that clear cut and dried to the fact that...
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:31 PM
Sep 2020

it's 100% democrats vs. some other ratio. I tend to believe that it's a mix of both sides, plus a few not belonging to either party, so it's a wash perhaps. And also, to the nature of their crimes, just how much of an imposition are these financial penalties? I don't know this (I can imagine that these people are getting out of jail, already are struggling w/ getting jobs (if able to, etc.)).

It would be interesting to see hard and steadfast evidence as to the breakdown of party affiliation, but like you said, why would the republicans pass this? Perhaps they passed it in a fit of an anti-crime stance that they must show, in that they are the party of law and order, but still.

What gets me is that this reminds me of the Jim Crow laws that were prevalent throughout the South, in restricting voters if they had felonies (and associated penalties).

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
19. well, of course it's not 100% Democratic
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:34 PM
Sep 2020

There are some Republicans, independents, etc.

I promise you, the Florida Republicans KNOW that the ONLY reason for this law was, that they knew ex-felons are MOSTLY (not all) Democratic. They didn't want those potential voters to vote.

Yes, I am not providing evidence, but I live here. My brother is deeply involved in the Florida Democratic Party. It is an open secret here.

If you don't believe me, that's fine. You can go do the hours of research and you will see I am accurate.

SWBTATTReg

(22,059 posts)
20. I'm not doing the research, I do trust you and your facts. Surprised? I simply just voiced a
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:44 PM
Sep 2020

couple of issues, that's it.

unblock

(52,113 posts)
5. just another recipe for horrible governance. institutional racism.
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:15 PM
Sep 2020

in some ways this may even be worse than a poll tax. it gives members of the controlling party in government an incentive to criminalize and fine behavior associated with people more likely to vote for the opposition.

now all sorts of things will be fined. they might even decline to try to actually collect it. just use the outstanding fine as an excuse to deny certain people the right to vote.


so instead of simply having to effectively pay to vote, now you get harassed and fined first.


oh, but i'm sure government will only use this on baaad people who deserve prison. the government would criminalize certain things or assign penalties to crimes based on racial considerations....

AnnaLee

(1,033 posts)
8. How come "who can vote" in a federal election is a states rights decision?
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:22 PM
Sep 2020

If an ex-felon from Florida moved to another state they could vote?

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
10. presidential elections are all done at the state level, so state laws come into play
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:24 PM
Sep 2020

Congress only certifies the results and canvasses the Electoral College for the final result.

sl8

(13,653 posts)
14. A big part of the problem is that Florida can't tell many of them what they owe.
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 04:28 PM
Sep 2020

The district court judge had come up with a plan for the state to follow.

Looks like that's out the window now.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
22. totally agree... the ex-felons could pay off their fines AND vote
Fri Sep 11, 2020, 05:00 PM
Sep 2020

The denial of the right to vote makes them almost non-citizens. It is outrageous and a true poll tax.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans achieve massi...