Fox's Napolitano: From SHITLER's potential SCotUS nominee to defendant/sexual assault

[UTUSN]

********QUOTE******

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/be-a-good-boy-lawsuit-graphically-accuses-fox-news-star-andrew-napolitano-of-sexual-assault/

‘Be a Good Boy’: Lawsuit Graphically Accuses Fox News Star Andrew Napolitano of Sexual Assault

Warning: details included in this story are graphic.

Former judge and current Fox News judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano was sued for sexual assault, battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress in Manhattan federal court on Friday. Napolitano says the charges are completely false. ....

Napolitano’s longtime employer is also standing by him as of now.

“Judge Napolitano has assured us in the strongest possible terms that these allegations are false and he will fight them aggressively in court,” Fox News said in a statement to Law&Crime. ....

***********UNQUOTE*****

[dhill926]

1. hasn't he been largely anti-trump....

[samnsara]

2. thats what I thought as well...

[a kennedy]

4. My initial thought.........but.....

are that afraid of him??

[UTUSN]

10. He's not "anti-Trump." Somebody with pretentions to legal credibility has to draw a line

somewhere in the face of the blatant lawlessness SHITLER shows. Not that I credit him with integrity.

He's pals with SHITLER, might have been cast off for a time by him, but whether they made up (as I think I read somewhere) they are basically as palsy as SHITLER is capable of being.

As for the post saying this dude hasn't been "potential" for a long time, the Subject line is space limited. Yes, he was "potential" in the first year or two of the SHITLER reign, but possibly couldn't pass the background check possibly for things like the current allegations.

As for not being a "potential" nominee for a long time, well, the current suit regards an alleged incident dating back to (1988?), so perhaps he hasn't had other alleged history for a long time, either!

The story is new. I can't provide sufficient exegesis to satisfy everybody, but experience portends that within 24 hours there will be a half-dozen other threads on the same topic, with thousands of Views and hundreds of Recs, so perhaps satisfaction to the relief of all will ensue.

[a kennedy]

3. Really??? Damn. If this true, I am gonna hurl.

[Silent3]

5. Potential SCOTUS nominee?

Was that before or after Napolitano's anti-Trump comments?

I don't want to dismiss any sexual assault charge off-handedly, but the motivation for a false accusation is strong here, and must be considered.

[OneGrassRoot]

6. He hasn't been a potential SCOTUS nominee for a few years...

on Trump's shit list.

[Garion_55]

7. That's what happens when you speak out against trump

Whether this is true or not won't be the point people will just assume it's true so he is screwed already

[dchill]

8. "...charges are completely false..."

As are they all. I'm so sure.

[Tribetime]

9. Well he denied it so trump has no reason

Not to believe him