Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,094 posts)
Sat Sep 12, 2020, 02:27 PM Sep 2020

Georgia likely removed nearly 200k from voter rolls wrongfully, report says




https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/02/politics/georgia-voter-rolls-report/index.html

(CNN)The state of Georgia has likely removed nearly 200,000 Georgia citizens from the voter rolls for wrongfully concluding that those people had moved and not changed the address on their voter registration, when in fact they never moved, according to a new report released on Wednesday.

The ACLU of Georgia released the report which was conducted by the Palast Investigative Fund, a nonpartisan group that focuses on data journalism, on Wednesday.

For the report, Palast hired expert firms to conduct an Advanced Address List Hygiene, a method of residential address verification, to review 313,243 names that were removed from the state's voter rolls in late 2019. Their findings claim that 63.3% of voters had not, in fact, moved and were purged in error.

Reacting to the report, Andrea Young, executive director of the ACLU of Georgia, told CNN, "on the one hand, I was deeply saddened and on the other side, not entirely surprised."

*snip*


9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Talitha

(6,586 posts)
5. "for wrongfully concluding"... Wow, they're really slathering on the BS.
Sat Sep 12, 2020, 02:52 PM
Sep 2020

They didn't wrongfully conclude - they did it on purpose.

We know it, and they know it too.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,854 posts)
6. Not voting in three years is far too short a time frame
Sat Sep 12, 2020, 03:06 PM
Sep 2020

to consider a voter inactive. At least six, preferably eight years should be the guideline.

But you also have to ask why 200,000 voters got the card and couldn't be bothered to respond.

lostnfound

(16,178 posts)
8. Assuming that they ever got the card. Data bases rewritten then rewritten again...
Sat Sep 12, 2020, 03:11 PM
Sep 2020

There are ways to corrupt every system (and most of those ways have been used by Kemp)

machoneman

(4,007 posts)
7. BUT, BUT BUT! In Ga, I'll venture that more Republiscum voters were removed than Democratic voters.
Sat Sep 12, 2020, 03:11 PM
Sep 2020

If these removals were random I'll guess, more RW voters were removed than Blue voters. Think of it this way: if it were CA, NY or other Blue states, far more of us would have been removed than the Reds.

Stargleamer

(1,989 posts)
9. With the intent purpose of denying Stacey Abrams the governorship
Sat Sep 12, 2020, 04:16 PM
Sep 2020

not to mention adversely affecting other races as well

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Georgia likely removed ne...