Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

greenman3610

(3,959 posts)
Sun Sep 13, 2020, 09:27 AM Sep 2020

Jonathan Capehart

putting on a master class in false balance reporting this weekend.


Giuliani yesterday, Lieberman today.
The childlike naivety of our elite journalists
continues to astonish me.

Presenting dishonest actors to your audience is not a service

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

True Blue American

(18,579 posts)
3. I was not impressed with e
Sun Sep 13, 2020, 09:33 AM
Sep 2020

Jonathon or Joe, ot Rudy. Fortunately I went back to Church this morning so was in a good moood. Masks and distancing. Not a problem. Music and up beat Sermon

Warpy

(114,504 posts)
4. I generally don't read him in the WaPo
Sun Sep 13, 2020, 09:33 AM
Sep 2020

There is only so much my eyes can do in a day.

I'm not surprised. Journalists have been playing for "access" for too damned long. It has poisoned journalism to the point that a lot of it isn't worth bothering with.

NRaleighLiberal

(61,698 posts)
6. the marching orders for the media is money. eyeballs. ads
Sun Sep 13, 2020, 09:39 AM
Sep 2020

Once you get that, you turn it off, because there's no reason to watch.

I came to that 10 yrs ago.

Mr. Ected

(9,713 posts)
7. Honestly, a television comes with an ON/OFF switch
Sun Sep 13, 2020, 09:42 AM
Sep 2020

Why not leave it in the OFF position when propagandists pollute the airwaves?

Knowledge is eroded and facts become distorted otherwise.

CentralMass

(16,908 posts)
11. I lost respect for Capehart in 2016 when he pushed the story that a 1962 photo
Sun Sep 13, 2020, 11:19 AM
Sep 2020

At the University of Chicago of Bernie at a civil rights sit-in in1962 was not Bernie. The fact that his partner was a long time aid to Hillary didn't help. Shortly after the article appeared in the WAPO the photographer who to took the photo came forward to state that it was Sanders and that at he had other photos from the roll etc. Capehart never really retracted the story. He chocked it up to muddled memories of the the people involved.

Vinca

(53,555 posts)
13. That was my first thought yesterday until he called the Ghoul's bluff: introduced Lev
Sun Sep 13, 2020, 02:33 PM
Sep 2020

as the next guest. With that in mind, I think he did a good job on that interview. Didn't see Lieberman fortunately. Overall, I like Jonathan Capehart.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jonathan Capehart