General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCNN just stated that Pfizer would know if their vaccine works by Oct
Breaking now
Squinch
(50,934 posts)hlthe2b
(102,193 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)Another issue is that it has to be kept frozen at extremely low temperatures, so figuring out how to distribute it (assuming it works) is going to be very difficult. Your local pharmacy doesn't have those types of freezers. Also, if two doses are required, people will have to come back to get the second dose. So none of this is going to happen any time soon.
captain queeg
(10,135 posts)And I dont think it will sway voters. Trumpers will like it but wont really get new recruits, and those who hate trump arent going to suddenly change their minds. I hope they do get a vaccine and Ill take it after a couple months if it turns out to be safe and effective.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Like I posted already, distribution is going to be tricky, because it requires the vaccine be kept frozen at extremely low temperatures.
Those freezers aren't normally available in either pharmacies or local family physicians.
Jarqui
(10,122 posts)Two required per person.
By the end of 2021, that would be 650 million people of out 7.6+ billion on the planet.
It is a novel approach that should get more medical scrutiny than what U of Oxford is trying - though all should get intense scrutiny.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)The first one they deemed unrelated to the vaccine, since the person apparently had MS. But what about the second one?
Jarqui
(10,122 posts)Jenner Institute has a good reputation
Unlike Moderna, the basis of their medical effort has been successful in humans before.
Beyond that, I don't have a clue.
The fact that they would suspend until they get to the bottom of it medically is a good sign. Maybe they found something that explains the second person. Who knows?
I'm glad they're all trying while realizing there is a fair chance that they may never find a vaccine.
But I still suspect we're going to get to a safer place sooner with therapeutics - that doesn't solve it entirely but takes a serious edge off the damage and mortality.
bluestarone
(16,894 posts)I'll wait for the next one, Fauci approves.
spanone
(135,814 posts)LuckyCharms
(17,425 posts)I'm not taking any vaccine unless it has Dr. Fauci's complete and enthusiastic approval.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)If it's a few months, is the vaccine worth it? No way to say by October, is it?
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)rzemanfl
(29,556 posts)Just read this post and breathe. If you aren't skeptical in 24 hours, you got the placebo. Sorry.
KWR65
(1,098 posts)Bengus81
(6,931 posts)Chainfire
(17,520 posts)it causes you liver to explode out your ass is two different things. You could place your body in an incinerator and it would work to get rid of the virus, but the side effects are hell.
MissMillie
(38,545 posts).
Yavin4
(35,430 posts)announcement, any positive announcement to help Trump. This is corporate PR speak, not science speak.
Thekaspervote
(32,750 posts)Into releasing a vaccine. And rightly so, I cannot even imagine the law suits!!
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)Thekaspervote
(32,750 posts)If they were ready to start giving a vaccine in less than 3 weeks they would have had to be in production mode for at the very for least 6-8 months.
Then theres the whole issue of the idiot king decimating the FDA, NIH and CDC the very agencies that would be responsible for distribution, storage, care and giving of the vaccine
hatrack
(59,583 posts)"Operation Warpspeed", shitty Trump lies and now some corporate fluffing.
The last major vaccine developed was for mumps and it took four years.