General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Top 1% of Americans Have Taken $50 Trillion From the Bottom 90%
The Top 1% of Americans Have Taken $50 Trillion From the Bottom 90%And That's Made the U.S. Less Secure
Like many of the viruss hardest hit victims, the United States went into the COVID-19 pandemic wracked by preexisting conditions. A fraying public health infrastructure, inadequate medical supplies, an employer-based health insurance system perversely unsuited to the momentthese and other afflictions are surely contributing to the death toll. But in addressing the causes and consequences of this pandemicand its cruelly uneven impactthe elephant in the room is extreme income inequality.
How big is this elephant? A staggering $50 trillion. That is how much the upward redistribution of income has cost American workers over the past several decades.
This is not some back-of-the-napkin approximation. According to a groundbreaking new working paper by Carter C. Price and Kathryn Edwards of the RAND Corporation, had the more equitable income distributions of the three decades following World War II (1945 through 1974) merely held steady, the aggregate annual income of Americans earning below the 90th percentile would have been $2.5 trillion higher in the year 2018 alone. That is an amount equal to nearly 12 percent of GDPenough to more than double median incomeenough to pay every single working American in the bottom nine deciles an additional $1,144 a month. Every month. Every single year.
Price and Edwards calculate that the cumulative tab for our four-decade-long experiment in radical inequality had grown to over $47 trillion from 1975 through 2018. At a recent pace of about $2.5 trillion a year, that number we estimate crossed the $50 trillion mark by early 2020. Thats $50 trillion that would have gone into the paychecks of working Americans had inequality held constant$50 trillion that would have built a far larger and more prosperous economy$50 trillion that would have enabled the vast majority of Americans to enter this pandemic far more healthy, resilient, and financially secure.
As the RAND report [whose research was funded by the Fair Work Center which co-author David Rolf is a board member of] demonstrates, a rising tide most definitely did not lift all boats. It didnt even lift most of them, as nearly all of the benefits of growth these past 45 years were captured by those at the very top. And as the American economy grows radically unequal it is holding back economic growth itself.
(snip)
It is easy to see how such a deadly virus, and the draconian measures required to contain it, might spark an economic depression. But look straight into the eyes of the elephant in the room, and it is impossible to deny the many ways in which our extreme inequalityan exceptionally American afflictionhas made the virus more deadly and its economic consequences more dire than in any other advanced nation. Why is our death toll so high and our unemployment rate so staggeringly off the charts? Why was our nation so unprepared, and our economy so fragile? Why have we lacked the stamina and the will to contain the virus like most other advanced nations? The reason is staring us in the face: a stampede of rising inequality that has been trampling the lives and livelihoods of the vast majority of Americans, year after year after year.
Of course, Americas chronic case of extreme inequality is old news. Many other studies have documented this trend, chronicled its impact, and analyzed its causes. But where others have painted the picture in terms of aggregate shares of GDP, productivity growth, or other cold, hard statistics, the RAND report brings the inequality price tag directly home by denominating it in dollarsnot just the aggregate $50 trillion figure, but in granular demographic detail. For example, are you a typical Black man earning $35,000 a year? You are being paid at least $26,000 a year less than you would have had income distributions held constant. Are you a college-educated, prime-aged, full-time worker earning $72,000? Depending on the inflation index used (PCE or CPI, respectively), rising inequality is costing you between $48,000 and $63,000 a year. But whatever your race, gender, educational attainment, urbanicity, or income, the data show, if you earn below the 90th percentile, the relentlessly upward redistribution of income since 1975 is coming out of your pocket.
https://time.com/5888024/50-trillion-income-inequality-america/
VERY informative and thought-provoking article. Much more at link.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Add some salt and barbecue sauce.
a kennedy
(29,658 posts)theaocp
(4,237 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)Republican policy, plain and simple. No doubt about it.
-Laelth
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)from 2008-17. That is what you call taking, in case anyone comes in here to protest.
Shareholder values, aka the end of America.
Nictuku
(3,613 posts)Anyone else notice the huge change of prices at the grocery store? I'm barely making ends meet, and I still have my job (working from home).
spooky3
(34,452 posts)For those struggling. Im sure the stores have some increased costs, but how much more?
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)You can trace many if not most if not all of our current state and woes to this alone.
Like the effect that impoverished environments have on people who live in them, this is the context that frames our overall state of well-being and abilities to thrive and respond.
Everything flows from, through and around that, IMHO.
fierywoman
(7,683 posts)I know.
mitch96
(13,904 posts)fierywoman
(7,683 posts)mitch96
(13,904 posts)Yavin4
(35,438 posts)$50 trillion is the price that White working class people in this country-- who have empowered Republicans on the federal, state, and local levels since the 1980s -- paid to give themselves a feeling of false superiority over the non-White working class.
Why can't we have Medicare for All? Because immigrants would get it.
Why don't we have better public schools? Because African Americans are intellectually inferior and spending money on education is a waste of money. See Charles Murrary.
Why don't we allow unions to organize? Because the benefits of a union would have to be shared with non-White workers and because White workers are naturally superior, they don't need labor protections.
And on. And on. And on.
The voting patterns have shown over the years that the only poor/working class that votes Republicans are the White poor and working class. ALL other racial working class groups vote for Democrats and for policies that help workers.
FakeNoose
(32,639 posts)They make a lot of interesting points on the way to the final conclusion.
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)K&R
Orrex
(63,210 posts)there is no problem that is not, at its root, caused by, perpetuated by, or worsened by the super-wealthy. Not one.
How many billionaires does the world need? Zero.
safeinOhio
(32,676 posts)The Gospel According to John Galt.
Blue Owl
(50,362 posts)Takket
(21,565 posts)Wealth taxes, capital gains taxes, corporate taxes
Stop putting the entire tax burden of the nation on the middle class.
Wipe out that national debt.
Put America to work.
These ideas sound radical but there is more than enough money just sitting there in the bank accounts, docks and driveways of the 1% to fix these problems and STILL leave them filthy rich and wanted for nothing.
moondust
(19,981 posts)Not just for the 99% who don't benefit directly but it will probably produce more "princelings" like Dump who inherit fortunes and never have to work or learn anything in order to get through life and maybe even become President. Some may end up running something (into the ground, like Dump) simply because they had a lot of money with which to buy their way into the "right" circles and management positions. More unqualified and incompetent management may lead to more "civilizational collapse" in the years ahead.