Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:35 PM Sep 2020

Collins is irrelevant right now.

She very well could prove to be a no vote but it might not really matter anyway. Since the GOP grew its majority in 2018, they have wiggle room - enough where Collins and Murkowski could be rock-solid no votes but a nominee still passes the senate.

The Republicans have 53 seats (not even counting Murkowski, who's an independent) and only need 51 votes to confirm Trump's pick.

Collins only becomes an issue if a couple Republicans step up and come out as a no vote.

Romney is floated as one but he ducked the question about filling a vacant SC seat in an election year when asked back in 2018.

But then who?

Lindsey Graham might be on record opposing any nominee in 2020 - but Graham is also on record calling Trump some of the worst names I've ever heard an elected official call him and he's now best golfing buds with him. Sure, maybe he says, "look, Donald, I am in the reelection campaign of my life ... I can't afford this battle."

But he also might realize Trump polls better than he does in South Carolina, so, uh, it might be politically advantageous to support the move.

Not like South Carolina is a swing state or even Democratic-leaning state like Colorado or Maine.

So, maybe Cory Gardner? He seems cooked regardless. But he's a tool.

In the end, there isn't enough no votes to make Collins vote matter.

She'll vote no, they'll confirm, she'll get to stand on principle and who knows, maybe is rewarded with a win this November. Win-win for her.

Lose-lose for us.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Collins is irrelevant right now. (Original Post) Drunken Irishman Sep 2020 OP
The Turtle says "The S.C. nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the U.S. Senate" Baclava Sep 2020 #1
Romney is actually the only one that said no tonight. Claustrum Sep 2020 #2
I don't think Romney has commented. Drunken Irishman Sep 2020 #3
You are correct. It's just someone said he said that. So we can't be sure. Claustrum Sep 2020 #4
Yup. If the makeup was the same as 2018, I think we would pull it off. Drunken Irishman Sep 2020 #5
Vote Collins out rockfordfile Sep 2020 #6
 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
1. The Turtle says "The S.C. nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the U.S. Senate"
Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:38 PM
Sep 2020

He dont say when, so, civil war goes hot?

Trump already floated, Ted Cruz!

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
3. I don't think Romney has commented.
Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:41 PM
Sep 2020

Some local Democratic pol from Salt Lake said he was told by a close person to Romney that he is a no vote but that seems to be bullshit. Romney my guess will vote yes.

Claustrum

(5,056 posts)
4. You are correct. It's just someone said he said that. So we can't be sure.
Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:42 PM
Sep 2020

Anyways, we needs 4 no votes. So it's a long shot no matter what.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
5. Yup. If the makeup was the same as 2018, I think we would pull it off.
Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:43 PM
Sep 2020

But not in the current make up of the senate.

It's going to happen.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Collins is irrelevant rig...