Democrats should threaten 2 more Supreme Court

[Hero57]

Judges if we win the senate, end of story we need to stop playing patty cakes with these people.

[bmpbmp]

1. Why 2 when 4 would give us the majority?

If you're gonna be a bear, be a grizzly.

[Blue_true]

8. 13 is a number that is avoided. The expansion would either be to 11 or 15. nt

[Hassler]

2. In negotiations, you start high, like adding 6 then agree on 4.

[Miguelito Loveless]

3. Six

Expand court to 15

[rso]

4. SCOTUS

We would not need to negotiate with the republicans if we win the Senate and the WH. We change the Senate rules with a simple majority and place as many justices as we want.

[AlexSFCA]

7. you'd better hold on to the senate forever then

cause if gop is ever in power again, whats stops them expanding SC to 21? Is there even a limit?

[rockfordfile]

5. you better win the Senate first

[Blaukraut]

6. But not until after the election.

Dems will be extremely pissed and motivated already to go out and vote, but let's not give the Republicans a reason to drag more of their asses out to the polls.

[qazplm135]

9. we should do it if it happens and we win

but we threatened a highly liberal replacement for Garland, and it even looked likely at the time that Hillary would win, they still went for it, and they still will go for it now.

[OnDoutside]

10. I don't know who it was but some knowledgeable lawyer suggested

a few months ago that they should nominate a new SC panel of 19 judges including 10 new ones, and cases would be decided by a random panel of 3.