Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOP plans to bring election before USSC. Worries about a tie. Wants RW appointee to decide.
Link to tweet
GOP now arguing Senate must replace Ginsburg now because if the election is litigated, just 8 justices risks a deadlock, and constitutional crisis.
Rubbish. Giving a last-minute Trump appointee power to decide whether Trump is the next president would be a constitutional crisis.
Rubbish. Giving a last-minute Trump appointee power to decide whether Trump is the next president would be a constitutional crisis.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 666 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP plans to bring election before USSC. Worries about a tie. Wants RW appointee to decide. (Original Post)
CousinIT
Sep 2020
OP
aeromanKC
(3,322 posts)1. Um, but that also was the case in 2016
So I call Bullshit.
Thekaspervote
(32,767 posts)2. I stopped reading Robert Reich some time ago...just so reactionary
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)3. Oh if it's just the Constitution that Republicans are worried about...
why not simple propose in advance that whoever the next president elect wants as the nominee to fill this SC vacancy will be the person who gets a confirmation hearing? I'm sure Democrats would agree to that. Problem solved.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)4. No excuse is beneath them
deplorables.