Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho’s Deceiving Whom? Prop 37 Has Corporations Running Scared
from Civil Eats:
Whos Deceiving Whom? Prop 37 Has Corps Running Scared
September 21st, 2012
By Anna Ghosh
Monsanto, DuPont, Dow, Pepsi and Coke are scared. Theyre afraid that Californias proposition 37 to make labeling of genetically engineered foods mandatory will end their unchecked, unquestioned power to hide GE ingredients in the majority processed foods without their customers knowledge. Which is why theyve poured millions into an anti-Prop 37 propaganda campaign theyre calling Stop the Deceptive Food Labeling Scheme. But whos deceiving who?
These corporations have enjoyed the transgenic food version of dont ask, dont tell that lax regulation has afforded them for more than two decades. During this time, GE ingredients have permeated the vast majority of our food supply with little independent, long-term scientific scrutiny (Finally this week, the first long-term peer-reviewed study on GE food was released and the results are frightening). Proposition 37 and several other statewide mandatory labeling initiatives in the works are about giving the power of information back to consumers and ending the tyranny that large corporations have had over our food supply.
But first, lets dispel some of the top myths that the Stop the Deceptive Food Labeling Scheme front group has been busy spinning.
Myth #1: GE labeling will mean higher food costs.
TRUTH: Opponents of labeling claim that mandatory GE food labeling would increase food costs for the average family by $600 to $825 per year, but since the opponents are the ones doing the analysis, its not surprising that theyre grossly overestimated. On the contrary, an impartial consulting firm did a study in 2001 for the U.K. Food Standards Agency and found that GE labeling would increase a households annual food spending by only 0.01 to 0.17 percent a very small figure ranging from an increase of $.33 to $5.58 in 2010 real U.S. dollars (inflation-adjusted) annually. Plus, food companies change their labels all the time (New and Improved! Heart Healthy!). .....................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://civileats.com/2012/09/21/who%E2%80%99s-deceiving-whom-prop-37-has-corps-running-scared/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1100 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who’s Deceiving Whom? Prop 37 Has Corporations Running Scared (Original Post)
marmar
Sep 2012
OP
Berlum
(7,044 posts)1. Human beings have a right to know
...what is in the food they are eating...Only a corporately funded, fascistically inclined bent-knee scumsucking, Republican-values, toe-tapping sockpuppet could possibly "argue' otherwise. Obviously.
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)2. Yes, indeed. K&R, n/t.
Berlum
(7,044 posts)3. Indeed, yes.