Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's authoritarian "anarchist jurisdictions" memo, explained
Typically, when the White House releases a document laying out a new policy, that document includes at least a few paragraphs explaining why the president has legal authority to set that policy. President Trumps latest policy memo, which seeks to strip federal funding from anarchist jurisdictions, does not even make this basic concession to the fact that the president is bound by laws.
The nearly 1,500-word memo does not contain a single legal citation. No statutes or judicial decisions are mentioned. Its as though it were written by someone who is blissfully unaware that there is an entire profession lawyers whose job is to give advice on whether particular actions are lawful or unlawful, and to provide legal arguments supporting their clients actions.
The broad policy laid out in the memo stripping federal funding from various cities because the president disagrees with those cities policing policy is unconstitutional.
.....................................................
The federal government may attach conditions to federal grants, and it may strip funding from states or localities that do not comply with those conditions. But its power to do so is not unlimited. As the Supreme Court explained in South Dakota v. Dole (1987), if Congress desires to condition the States receipt of federal funds, it must do so unambiguously ... enabl[ing] the States to exercise their choice knowingly, cognizant of the consequences of their participation.
A key word in this passage is Congress. The legislative branch may impose new conditions on federal grants, but Trump is not Congress. He may not.
The nearly 1,500-word memo does not contain a single legal citation. No statutes or judicial decisions are mentioned. Its as though it were written by someone who is blissfully unaware that there is an entire profession lawyers whose job is to give advice on whether particular actions are lawful or unlawful, and to provide legal arguments supporting their clients actions.
The broad policy laid out in the memo stripping federal funding from various cities because the president disagrees with those cities policing policy is unconstitutional.
.....................................................
The federal government may attach conditions to federal grants, and it may strip funding from states or localities that do not comply with those conditions. But its power to do so is not unlimited. As the Supreme Court explained in South Dakota v. Dole (1987), if Congress desires to condition the States receipt of federal funds, it must do so unambiguously ... enabl[ing] the States to exercise their choice knowingly, cognizant of the consequences of their participation.
A key word in this passage is Congress. The legislative branch may impose new conditions on federal grants, but Trump is not Congress. He may not.
https://www.vox.com/2020/9/3/21419767/trump-anarchist-jurisdictions-authoritarian-illegal-unconstitutional-supreme-court
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 625 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's authoritarian "anarchist jurisdictions" memo, explained (Original Post)
ehrnst
Sep 2020
OP
anyone but me notice none of the mayors or governors aren't biting? Says a lot
Thekaspervote
Sep 2020
#2
cags
(1,914 posts)1. In that case states can refuse to remit federal taxes to
An "anarchist, fascist" federal government.
What's good for the goose
Thekaspervote
(32,762 posts)2. anyone but me notice none of the mayors or governors aren't biting? Says a lot