General Discussion

Name removed

(0 posts) Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:00 PM Sep 2020

Message auto-removed

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Message auto-removed (Original Post) Name removed Sep 2020 OP

Q for Mrs. Barrett - howw can she be a handmaid to her spouse and on the Supreme Court... haele Sep 2020 #1

Actually: "Who is going to make the decision if you husband disagrees with your stance?" Maraya1969 Sep 2020 #4

Excellent question, which I trust Dems will hammer home in the hearings. klook Sep 2020 #20

She's an ideal model for EXPANDING THE COURT!!!!!! calimary Sep 2020 #25

This. Public servants swear oaths to fulfill their duties Hortensis Sep 2020 #22

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2020 #13

She believes the Holy Spirit lives in her, her actions are sanctioned by God & will sit by Jesus. TheBlackAdder Sep 2020 #2

Read some of these. Look at how many are not qualified. Frustratedlady Sep 2020 #3

Really, why not just nominate Michelle Bachman. BadgerMom Sep 2020 #17

Barrett is younger than Bachman jayschool2013 Sep 2020 #18

If the Dems get in power can they get rid of any of the Neanderthals? Maraya1969 Sep 2020 #5

Quick pic Roland99 Sep 2020 #6

Jeez, I knew this woman was a kook, but holy shit! GoCubsGo Sep 2020 #9

Check out this quote from the zealot: Roland99 Sep 2020 #10

Good gawd! I take it she's Catholic? GoCubsGo Sep 2020 #11

Yes, but the nutcase, Bill Barr type of Catholic...not the sane Joe Biden type Roland99 Sep 2020 #12

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2020 #14

It is ridiculous to have a federal judge who has never tried a case to preside over one! Dustlawyer Sep 2020 #7

It is ridiculous to have a federal judge who has never tried a case to preside over one! Dustlawyer Sep 2020 #8

Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2020 #15

Like having a Secretary of Education who's never been BadgerMom Sep 2020 #16

Good analogy jayschool2013 Sep 2020 #19

Bingo! BadgerMom Sep 2020 #24

The quote @ the bottom of the bios is important for our democrary: "When injustice becomes Illumination Sep 2020 #21

Thanks for this link! smirkymonkey Sep 2020 #23

K&R UTUSN Sep 2020 #26

haele

(12,679 posts)

1. Q for Mrs. Barrett - howw can she be a handmaid to her spouse and on the Supreme Court...

Reply to Name removed (Original post)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:04 PM

Sep 2020

Doesn't her husband need her to keep his house in order, like a proper handmaid does?
Or is she just an over-priviledged hypocrite like all her other wannabe fellow Gilieadans?

Haele

Maraya1969

(22,500 posts)

4. Actually: "Who is going to make the decision if you husband disagrees with your stance?"

Reply to haele (Reply #1)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:25 PM

Sep 2020

She should not be a judge anywhere since she states openly that her husband can change her decisions at will.

klook

(12,167 posts)

20. Excellent question, which I trust Dems will hammer home in the hearings.

Reply to Maraya1969 (Reply #4)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 03:50 PM

Sep 2020

She looks crazed and sounds creepy as hell. This reverence for the husband as lord and master is a dream for many Republican men. Disgusting.

calimary

(81,500 posts)

25. She's an ideal model for EXPANDING THE COURT!!!!!!

Reply to klook (Reply #20)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 09:36 PM

Sep 2020

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)

22. This. Public servants swear oaths to fulfill their duties

Reply to Maraya1969 (Reply #4)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 04:04 PM

Sep 2020

ethically and under the law; others whose authority they might merely front for, like religious leaders, do not.

Response to haele (Reply #1)

Name removed Message auto-removed

TheBlackAdder

(28,216 posts)

2. She believes the Holy Spirit lives in her, her actions are sanctioned by God & will sit by Jesus.

Reply to Name removed (Original post)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:11 PM

Sep 2020

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)

3. Read some of these. Look at how many are not qualified.

Reply to Name removed (Original post)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:14 PM

Sep 2020

Most of these are the opposite of RBG and would be an insult if named.

BadgerMom

(2,771 posts)

17. Really, why not just nominate Michelle Bachman.

Reply to Frustratedlady (Reply #3)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 02:48 PM

Sep 2020

jayschool2013

(2,313 posts)

18. Barrett is younger than Bachman

Reply to BadgerMom (Reply #17)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 03:22 PM

Sep 2020

So the damage would be much greater. Republicans are good at that. We tend to nominate justices who have actually earned the honor.

Maraya1969

(22,500 posts)

5. If the Dems get in power can they get rid of any of the Neanderthals?

Reply to Name removed (Original post)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:25 PM

Sep 2020

Roland99

(53,342 posts)

6. Quick pic

Reply to Name removed (Original post)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:29 PM

Sep 2020

Link to tweet

GoCubsGo

(32,094 posts)

9. Jeez, I knew this woman was a kook, but holy shit!

Reply to Roland99 (Reply #6)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:46 PM

Sep 2020

Does this nutbag even have a law degree?

Roland99

(53,342 posts)

10. Check out this quote from the zealot:

Reply to GoCubsGo (Reply #9)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:54 PM

Sep 2020

Speaking to Notre Dame Law School graduates years ago, Barrett said that they should always remember that a "legal career is but a means to an end ... and that end is building the Kingdom of God."

GoCubsGo

(32,094 posts)

11. Good gawd! I take it she's Catholic?

Reply to Roland99 (Reply #10)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:56 PM

Sep 2020

Is being Catholic now a prerequisite for a USSC nomination? It sure seems like it.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)

12. Yes, but the nutcase, Bill Barr type of Catholic...not the sane Joe Biden type

Reply to GoCubsGo (Reply #11)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:58 PM

Sep 2020

Response to Roland99 (Reply #10)

Name removed Message auto-removed

Dustlawyer

(10,497 posts)

7. It is ridiculous to have a federal judge who has never tried a case to preside over one!

Reply to Name removed (Original post)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:40 PM

Sep 2020

How can they rule on objections and evidence without any experience in the trenches? I bet all of these judges first several trials were a joke and complete miscarriage of justice.

Dustlawyer

(10,497 posts)

8. It is ridiculous to have a federal judge who has never tried a case to preside over one!

Reply to Name removed (Original post)

Mon Sep 21, 2020, 01:42 PM

Sep 2020

How can they rule on objections and evidence without any experience in the trenches? I bet all of these judges first several trials were a joke and complete miscarriage of justice.