General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCDC says it erroneously posted guidance that said coronavirus spreads through air and travels beyond
CDC says it erroneously posted guidance that said coronavirus spreads through air and travels beyond 6 feetThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Monday it erroneously posted guidance saying the coronavirus spreads through airborne particles that can remain suspended in the air and travel beyond 6 feet.
The updated guidance, posted on the CDCs website on Friday, also recommended that people use air purifiers to reduce airborne germs indoors to prevent the disease from spreading, according to Reuters.
A draft version of proposed changes to these recommendations was posted in error to the agencys official website, the CDC said Monday. CDC is currently updating its recommendations regarding airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19). Once this process has been completed, the update language will be posted.
Earlier in the day, the World Health Organization said it contacted the CDC about the guidance change.
The WHO had not seen any new evidence on airborne particles and was checking with the CDC to better understand the exact nature of the change, Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHOs health emergencies program, said during a news conference at the agencys Geneva headquarters.
...
Studies have suggested the virus can spread through the air. A study published by researchers at the National Institutes of Health earlier this year found that particles of the coronavirus released by talking can remain in the air for eight to 14 minutes.
A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that Covid-19 was detectable in aerosols for up to three hours.
In July, the WHO said there is still no definitive evidence that indicates the virus is spreading widely by air, although it added that the possibility of airborne transmission in public settings cannot be ruled out.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/21/cdc-says-it-erroneously-posted-guidance-that-said-coronavirus-spreads-through-air-and-and-travel-beyond-six-feet.html
CDC totally screwed up testing for a month. Even then, it never really got testing at scale. That was done by commercial testing companies.
They have also screwed up with respect to airborne transmission. They attempt to fall in line with WHO, who are mightily resisting airborne transmission for reasons that elude me.
And WHO totally screwed up by not recommending immediate halt to international air travel. This is also political, and restrictions on travel were lobbied against by groups such as Doctors without Borders, since it interfered with their ability to send people to epidemic areas, especially during ebola outbreaks.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,493 posts)how exactly is it spread?
Actually, it is airborne, and that is how you get it. How long the particles stay in the air, and how far they travel is apparently a bit up in the air, so to speak.
Meanwhile, the constant scrubbing of every surface is genuinely counter productive.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)Key Points
Question What is the association between the daily wear of eyeglasses and susceptibility to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?
Findings In this cohort of 276 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Suizhou, China, the proportion of daily wearers of eyeglasses was lower than that of the local population (5.8% vs 31.5%).
Meaning These findings suggest that daily wearers of eyeglasses may be less likely to be infected with COVID-19.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/2770872
Although it is possible that eyeglass wearers rub their eyes less frequently and that could account for the protection.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)All the pundits were wondering this morning, how long before CDC takes down the correct guidance and posts a bunch of lies again. Looks like about 7 hours.
Response to Klaralven (Original post)
Oldwing This message was self-deleted by its author.
CentralMass
(16,994 posts)flamingdem
(40,980 posts)again.
This way there's no legal obligation to improve ventilation in buildings and in transportation areas.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)flamingdem
(40,980 posts)Lots of money needs to be spent on HEPA filters in all these places.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.