General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJezebel.com relentlessly attacks Democrats as if the both-sides-but-Democrats-are-worse
bullshit is still trendy. I have a decades-long habit of visiting this website, but it's purely hate-reading now. Not even Russian trolls are doing this sort of nonsense anymore, it's too obvious.
The Fearless Girl Wall Street statue is a "corporate feminist avatar," "a literal sponcon for Wall St., commissioned by an investment firm to advocate for more women executives in finance."
http://www.jezebel.com/enough-of-this-please-1845136904
RBG's image as "benevolent matriarch ... was never in step with reality." "Ginsberg espoused incremental change and dutiful compromise ... a path to stagnation rather than lasting change."
http://www.jezebel.com/ruth-bader-ginsberg-alone-was-never-going-to-save-us-1845126301
Ru Paul wins an Emmy and in his acceptance speech urges people to vote. Jezebel turns this into a Susan Sarandon-type nutty anti-fracking attack. "Both the Democratic former Vice President and Republican incumbent Donald Trump are vocal supporters of the environmentally destructive method of resource-extration that Ru's apparently been profiting off of for years."
http://www.jezebel.com/rupaul-reminds-us-to-vote-for-the-pro-fracking-candidate-1845123110
Like "The Producers," trying to go out of business? Hardly any comments on the site anymore, and most correcting the ignorance of the "writers" on the site. What a shame.
LakeArenal
(28,867 posts)Im sure there is a lot of RW crap Im not interested in hearing. Not sure why I should.
betsuni
(25,774 posts)tgenerico
(109 posts)They were part of the Gawker group before Gawker was sued out of business for libel relating to the size of Hulk Hogan's package.
No particular significance as journalists or propagandists.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,423 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,411 posts)It says RBG was better than the corporation who paid for the statue of the girl.
The second mentions John Lewis (approvingly), and that's as close as it gets to Democrats. It says that a feminist like RBG in the Supreme Court was not enough; that a faulty election system needs fixing, and people would then need to use it to implement change.
The third is an attack on RuPaul for owning a ranch on which he gets money for fracking. The link with Democrats is that Biden is not going to ban fracking. That's mentioned, but the article is not mainly about Democrats (or Republicans), and there's no "Democrats are worse" implication.
Why do you think being anti-fracking is "nutty"? It's a responsible environmental stance. It is annoying that Biden said "I am not banning fracking. Let me say that again: I am not banning fracking". If you think that any website must toe the Democratic presidential candidate line 100%, you're being ridiculous (I bet I could find a Democratic politician who says "I want to ban fracking" .
betsuni
(25,774 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,411 posts)You're laughing that I took your bait? That I mistakenly thought you actually cared about what you said?
betsuni
(25,774 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,411 posts)betsuni
(25,774 posts)The writer said "I find this all horrible tiresome."
muriel_volestrangler
(101,411 posts)and its action. Maybe you should read Jezebel more closely before slagging it off:
I find all of this horribly tiresome. The statue doesnt represent any meaningful contribution to feminism, nor is it a meaningful tribute to Ginsburg. In a way though, it is fitting: Just as some people would like to see Fearless Girl as a straightforward representation girl power, so do they wish to think of Ginsburg and her legacy as being purely inspiring and uncomplicated.
betsuni
(25,774 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,411 posts)But I'm glad to see you think about the actual piece, rather than continue to think it's about Democrats.
Shall we move on to link number 2?
betsuni
(25,774 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,411 posts)I don't think you'll get very far if you just deny what's in front of your own eyes. You'd look more convincing if you tried to make an argument, rather than just contradicting things.
betsuni
(25,774 posts)What does that mean?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,411 posts)Because that's what the paragraph before that sentence is about. "This" means "what I have just written about".
Piasladic
(1,160 posts)It seems that they took on your argument and broke it down. What's funny?
betsuni
(25,774 posts)Piasladic
(1,160 posts)Just saying it's wrong doesn't tell me what you think is wrong, why it's wrong, or why it's funny that they are wrong.
betsuni
(25,774 posts)Piasladic
(1,160 posts)I think they were just pointing out errors in your argument. I guess I don't get your sense of humor.
demmiblue
(36,914 posts)I read the first article and couldn't figure out what the beef was, so I didn't bother with the others.
I still like 'Fearless Girl', but I also can see the issue the author of the article raises.
Just putting this here... Kamala Harris is against fracking, as well as Inslee, Booker, Warren, etc.
FelineOverlord
(3,604 posts)I used to read it a lot right before and after the election.
Especially Barf Bag.
But they have really gone off the rails in the last few months.
betsuni
(25,774 posts)Yavin4
(35,454 posts)it's psyops. Ramp up the cynicism on the left to depress turnout.
betsuni
(25,774 posts)Sympthsical
(9,181 posts)If this is right-wing and Russian, Im beginning to wonder what could possibly be allowable anymore.
Im not a fan of the site. They get goofy sometimes.
But Russian? Not everything we dislike is Russian. Its gotten to the weird conspiracy area at this point. I expect in a month, New York Times? Totally Russian. And someone will trace out why.
betsuni
(25,774 posts)nsd
(2,406 posts)Sympthsical
(9,181 posts)I havent been able to read the site in ages because the newer writers over time just seem like a bunch of cranks.
But theres no doubt theyre pretty liberal and will vote Democratic no matter what.
Demsrule86
(68,775 posts)betsuni
(25,774 posts)Last edited Tue Sep 22, 2020, 11:01 AM - Edit history (1)
What's the problem?
Response to betsuni (Reply #10)
TwilightZone This message was self-deleted by its author.
Many of us never heard of it, now we do. All this does is spread the vitriol.
betsuni
(25,774 posts)Sunsky
(1,737 posts)posted, I'm glad I haven't.
betsuni
(25,774 posts)Don't know why this is so difficult to understand. Jezebel has been around forever. Used to be great.
brooklynite
(94,941 posts)betsuni
(25,774 posts)Cuthbert Allgood
(5,002 posts)Here is the next sentence, too:
What they find tiresome is taking something which is just a corporate attempt to look feminist without actually being feminist and then trying to turn that into a Ginsburg tribute. That is what is tiresome. Do you disagree? Why?
betsuni
(25,774 posts)It's a statue. It takes money to fund art. Always has.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,002 posts)without actually doing an actual thing to address the issue? And then coopting RBG? I kind of do. I get it.
Piasladic
(1,160 posts)I keep wondering if it's a reading comprehension issue or something else.
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,002 posts)melman
(7,681 posts)I'll go with that too. Something else.
ismnotwasm
(42,023 posts)One of the things feminism does is promote equality, or rather, at least level the playing field. Pretending Wall Street isnt relevant To women or cant be changed To better womens lives.. as it cant be immediately eradicated...(or whatever the goal, I dont understand people who refuse to accept here and now reality) is kinda dumb.
I havent been reading Jezebel lately, maybe they got a new crew in.
I know one thing though. At one time, they knew those assholes who refused to support and actively tore down Hillary Clinton were, in fact Disgusting Assholes, (and do continue to be)
We screamed Supreme Court as loud and as long as we could. We failed.
And now the price is paid.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)I hate myself enough. I don't need some privileged white woman who makes enough to afford a loft in New York City vomiting on her laptop her issues.
ismnotwasm
(42,023 posts)Dont do that. Youve always seemed like a good person to me.
Jezebel is just an online rag with a bunch of opinions. They kinda lost credibility a while back. I think the OP is saying they have moved into actively destructive territory. I quit reading them too, so I dont know