Accused Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse will fight his extradition to Wisconsin for homicide case,

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

Kyle Rittenhouse — the Illinois gunman accused of fatally shooting two men and injuring a third during a protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin last month — remained silent as his attorney said he would fight the teen's extradition to Wisconsin to face murder charges during a Friday hearing.

"We intend to challenge extradition by writ of habeas corpus," said Rittenhouse's attorney John Pierce.

The hearing took place virtually with all parties appearing via Zoom, including Rittenhouse, who remains in the Lake County Juvenile Detention Center.

Dressed in a dark blue prison uniform and wearing a light bluish-gray face mask, Rittenhouse was quiet throughout the hearing outside of saying, "Good Morning, your honor," to the judge.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/accused-kenosha-shooter-kyle-rittenhouse-203303219.html

Lots of luck dumbfuck.

[dawg day]

1. his mother and lawyer went to a GOP meeting--

And got applauded.

The Trump Death Cult.

[imanamerican63]

3. They should arrest her!

[OAITW r.2.0]

2. He is a killer. Sorry, Kyle, you fucked up your entire life.

Enjoy a lifetime behind bars, killer.

[Progressive Jones]

7. What matters is the three lives he fucked up, not his. May this little prick has a very ugly end. nt

[Olafjoy]

4. Yeah. He shot and killed white people. They don't let you off for that

Sorry. I know that is disgusting. But it’s true.

[Aristus]

5. Is extraditing him a good thing?

I've read some posts that state the opinion that no jury in Wisconsin would convict him.

[RhodeIslandOne]

6. I thought Wisconsin was his "home"

Fucking idiots.

[TheBlackAdder]

8. Good luck with that! No not really. Fuck you kid and your mom too!

[struggle4progress]

9. Constitution Article IV, Section II, Clause 2

A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.

[struggle4progress]

10. PUERTO RICO v. BRANSTAD

483 US 219
Argued March 30, 1987.
Decided June 23, 1987.

MARSHALL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court ...

... On February 4, 1981, Calder was arraigned before a District Court of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, charged with first-degree murder and attempted murder. Calder failed to appear at a preliminary hearing on March 4, 1981, and bail was increased to $50,000. Despite representations by counsel that Calder would appear at a preliminary hearing on April 13, 1981, he did not do so. At that time Calder was declared a fugitive from justice, and bail was increased to $300,000. The Puerto Rican police, having reason to believe that Calder had left Puerto Rico and returned to his family's home in Iowa, notified local authorities in Iowa that Calder was a fugitive wanted in Puerto Rico on murder charges ...

On May 15, 1981, the Governor of Puerto Rico submitted to the Governor of Iowa a request for Calder's extradition. The requesting papers included the arrest warrant, the fugitive resolution, the charging documents, and three sworn statements of witnesses, including one in which the affiant identified a photograph of Calder as depicting the driver of the car ...

... on December 28, 1981, Iowa's Governor, Robert Ray, formally notified the Governor of Puerto Rico that in the absence of a "change to a more realistic charge," the request for extradition was denied ... A subsequent extradition request made to Governor Ray's successor .. was also denied ...

... We reaffirm the conclusion that the commands of the Extradition Clause are mandatory, and afford no discretion to the executive officers or courts of the asylum State ...

... It has long been a settled principle that federal courts may enjoin unconstitutional action by state officials ...

... Because the duty is directly imposed upon the States by the Constitution itself, there can be no need to weigh the performance of the federal obligation against the powers reserved to the States under the Tenth Amendment ...

... the Extradition Act clearly applies. The Act requires rendition of fugitives at the request of a demanding "Territory," as well as State ...

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/483/219

[struggle4progress]

11. 18 USC 3182

Whenever the executive authority of any State or Territory demands any person as a fugitive from justice, of the executive authority of any State, District, or Territory to which such person has fled, and produces a copy of an indictment found or an affidavit made before a magistrate of any State or Territory, charging the person demanded with having committed treason, felony, or other crime, certified as authentic by the governor or chief magistrate of the State or Territory from whence the person so charged has fled, the executive authority of the State, District, or Territory to which such person has fled shall cause him to be arrested and secured, and notify the executive authority making such demand, or the agent of such authority appointed to receive the fugitive, and shall cause the fugitive to be delivered to such agent when he shall appear ...

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3182

[KLRIQ2]

12. The extradition fight is about Juvenile vs Adult charges

Illinois would likely charge him as a Juvenile and in Wisconsin he would be charged as an Adult.

[struggle4progress]

13. ... Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker has already signed a warrant transferring Rittenhouse

to Wisconsin at the request of Gov. Tony Evers ...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/kyle-rittenhouses-attorney-challenges-extradition-to-wisconsin-to-face-kenosha-shooting-charges/ar-BB19rVXP