Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DanieRains

(4,619 posts)
Sun Sep 27, 2020, 02:57 AM Sep 2020

Should We Pollute Lots More If It Creates A Few More Jobs?

Cutting regulations can create jobs.

How many premature deaths directly caused by increased pollution is one job worth?

How many burned acres is a job worth?

It would take a real reporter to ask those questions to any politician.

But who am I? Just someone from Fire Hell. Methow Valley WA.

I am sick of Trump bragging about unemployment rates when he is literally murdering the Earth cutting regulations.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should We Pollute Lots More If It Creates A Few More Jobs? (Original Post) DanieRains Sep 2020 OP
Or can Green Jobs save the planet and provide safeinOhio Sep 2020 #1
Within 20 years trying to save coal jobs will be tantamount to Volaris Sep 2020 #2
Might Be Simpler ProfessorGAC Sep 2020 #3
NO! abqtommy Sep 2020 #4
Why not? The planet is totally screwed anyway. Klaralven Sep 2020 #5

Volaris

(10,266 posts)
2. Within 20 years trying to save coal jobs will be tantamount to
Sun Sep 27, 2020, 05:52 AM
Sep 2020

Trying to save the buggy whip making industry.

And that has NOTHING to do with politics and EVERYTHING to do with the GOPs vaunted Free Market (which means the coal workers are just shit out of luck). And if they wanna be obstinate and NOT vote for the things we want that will actually help them survive the change and thrive into the future without those jobs, then they're on their own and that does suck, but I'm tired of listening to them whine about it.

ProfessorGAC

(64,857 posts)
3. Might Be Simpler
Sun Sep 27, 2020, 06:30 AM
Sep 2020

Environmental protection already CREATED jobs.
Mid-size & large companies employ batallions of safety & environmental professionals.
Systems in place to abate emissions were built by, and operated by typical working folks, many of them union.
Regulations cost fewer jobs than they create, without even counting the masses of federal & state workers enforcing administrative laws.
The only thing deregulation does is save individual companies operating cash, but the macroeconomic impact of those people now not having a job is a net negative.

 

Klaralven

(7,510 posts)
5. Why not? The planet is totally screwed anyway.
Sun Sep 27, 2020, 07:38 AM
Sep 2020

Population will go from the current 7.8 billion to 9.7 billion by 2050 and 11 billion by 2100.

Current GDP/capita is about $17K, compared with the US at about $60K. China's increased greatly over the past 30 years and it is now about average.

If India and Southeast Asia manage to replicate China's feat by 2050 that will add hundreds of millions to the global middle class and vastly increase resource usage and waste.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should We Pollute Lots Mo...