Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Atticus

(15,124 posts) Sun Sep 27, 2020, 07:12 PM Sep 2020

Is the NYT expose about Trump's tax records the deus ex machina we've prayed for? nt

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is the NYT expose about Trump's tax records the deus ex machina we've prayed for? nt (Original Post) Atticus Sep 2020 OP

I'm not praying for a deus ex machina. I'm voting. NT mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2020 #1

I'm not depending on one, but would certainly welcome one. nt Atticus Sep 2020 #2

Probably not. But it sure is fun reading. LakeArenal Sep 2020 #3

I learned after 3 1/2 years or so never to get my hopes up Stargleamer Sep 2020 #4

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,527 posts)

1. I'm not praying for a deus ex machina. I'm voting. NT

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Sun Sep 27, 2020, 07:15 PM

Sep 2020

Atticus

(15,124 posts)

2. I'm not depending on one, but would certainly welcome one. nt

Reply to mahatmakanejeeves (Reply #1)

Sun Sep 27, 2020, 07:18 PM

Sep 2020

LakeArenal

(28,827 posts)

3. Probably not. But it sure is fun reading.

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Sun Sep 27, 2020, 07:25 PM

Sep 2020

Stargleamer

(1,990 posts)

4. I learned after 3 1/2 years or so never to get my hopes up

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Sun Sep 27, 2020, 07:25 PM

Sep 2020

he always has the support of 40% of the electorate. ALWAYS, but with the potential to garner another 3 to 5% of the electorate. This 3 to 4.5% of the electorate may be saying today they'll vote for Biden today, but come tomorrow if an anti-Biden TV ad strikes a nerve with them, they gladly go back to supporting Trump again. They are that capricious.

Reply to this discussion