General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew Post/ABC poll of Pennsylvania
Link to tweet
New Post/ABC poll of Pennsylvania:
Biden 54%
Trump 45%
Notably, that 9 point lead is the same as the one in yesterday's NYT/Siena poll.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)And Biden-Harris wins 63 states crushing the breath out of the GOP.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)shows Americans hate tax avoiders/cheats. I think the numbers will keep improving.
onetexan
(13,036 posts)He's a liar &a cheat in every aspect of his life.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I do believe it along with the numerous other recent revelations will add up. His base is with him no matter what and the GOP leadership is stuck with the monster they helped create, but each of these announcements will peal off a few voters. Hopefully its enough to deal the GOP a soul crushing defeat in November as we win 63 states, a few territories and the intergalactic vote.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)I'll take it as it stands.
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)malaise
(268,914 posts)It is going to be a wipeout!
Bigredhunk
(1,349 posts)Giddeyup!
OrlandoDem2
(2,065 posts)Trump must suffer the consequences!
bucolic_frolic
(43,126 posts)A very good sign in my view. If we get over 50, Trump's done in PA.
Amishman
(5,555 posts)Trump's support out here in the countryside is much more visible than 2016.
I think Biden wins the state with right at or just above 50%
I put a floor on Trump in PA of about 45%, and third parties will grab 2-3% as well.
Wounded Bear
(58,645 posts)which is high for a poll, but the results are out of the MoE by a significant amount.
I like the trends, at least.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Trump is murdering hundreds of thousands of people, disproportionately his own supporters. This is not good campaign practice.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)before the NY Times tax bombshells landed
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)nt
BumRushDaShow
(128,834 posts)With five weeks until Election Day, the poll finds that 53 percent of Pennsylvanias registered voters approve of Trumps management of the economy, but 57 percent disapprove of his handling of the coronavirus outbreak, and that issue appears to sway more voters than does the economy. Trumps overall approval rating in the state among registered voters is 43 percent positive and 55 percent negative, with 49 percent saying they disapprove strongly.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/29/biden-trump-pennsylvania-poll/
In this election game, the whole concept of "registered voters" is a complete meaningless metric only meant to sucker a person in before they sucker-punch you with the "likely voter" metric, which itself is nothing more than a "guess".
And then for "likely voters", they show a fucking 5% MOE? The poll only looked at 567 "likely voters" (who did they considered "likely" )?
And then bullshit about " 53 percent of Pennsylvanias registered voters approve of Trumps management of the economy"? The UE in PA (as of August) was 10.3%.
I hate to say it and repeat a 20+ year mantra about it being "the economy stupid" because you still have loons who believe that coronavirus is a "hoax" or "isn't that bad and is like the flu" (despite the fact that I just saw a mention, I think yesterday, where the death toll has now surpassed the combined total of deaths caused by all other major outbreaks like flu, measles, polio, ebola, etc.).
Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)turning out...so yeah I think we are likely to win by big numbers.
BumRushDaShow
(128,834 posts)Among registered voters in Pennsylvania: 9/26/20
Economy 25
Coronavirus outbreak 18
Crime and safety 14
Equal treatment of racial groups 13
Health care 12
Appointment to U.S. SupremeCourt 9
Other (vol.) 7No opinion 2
https://context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/55ca9d44-d341-4d37-9edd-93785b8d1e6c/note/43c78239-b16f-43c9-b30d-d79fcb950932.#page=1
I think the only way to "correct" for what they may be considering "likely voters" this go-around, is to look to 2018, that although was an "off year" election, may have some clues about "new voters" who either didn't vote in 2016, voted 3rd party in 2016, or were not old enough to vote at the time, but then came out in 2018 to flip some seats - i.e., Democrats gained 10 seats in the state House and 4 seats in the State Senate (where only 1/2 of the Senators were up, as I believe those have 4-year terms).
ETA - I found a graphic of what happened between 2016 and 2018 with the state's House reps (from here - https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-house-seats-vs-votes/)-
The "likely voters" metric in 2016 was off the mark, as a group from out of nowhere, many of them racist scum, voted for the first time in 2016, which was enough to offset those who "believed the hype" due to foreign interference, and/or experienced other means of voter suppression.
DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)but this poll does also give the same data for registered voters. Pollsters generally work off registered voter lists, too.
Given so few undecideds (1%), the pollster must have pressed "leaners" for their choice.
BumRushDaShow
(128,834 posts)which if taken at face value, suggests that people have pretty much "made up their minds" (assuming people aren't lying when they respond to a poll) and it comes down to turn out, and getting the votes correctly registered and tabulated.
DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)for awhile. What's truly stunning is the split between "somewhat disapprove" and "strongly disapprove". Well over 90% of the total disapproval is "strongly disapprove". "Strongly disapprove" is nearly double the number of "strongly approve", too.
Of all the PA polls I've seen I don't think Trump has topped 45% in any of them.
MissB
(15,805 posts)My son lives in Pittsburgh and said that as of yesterday, 25% of Allegheny county residents had been approved for mail in ballots.
When you think about that, thats a huge number, because all of Allegheny county population includes kids under the age of 18 not eligible to vote.
lindysalsagal
(20,666 posts)PA has everything from ex pat NYC's to alabama, and urban black and violent racists. I'd put more confidence in a larger sample, honestly.
BumRushDaShow
(128,834 posts)and are done less frequently than the almighty "national polls".
DeminPennswoods
(15,278 posts)Link: https://iqsresearch.com/what-makes-a-statistically-valid-sample/
The best, most accurate way to find out would be to ask every single person in Louisville. But at 1,000,000 people in the region, thats impossible. So statisticians and researchers have created methods that allow us to ask a sample of the population to get that information we want.
So what is a small enough sample that we can predict how many Louisvillians like vanilla ice cream? Half a million? No. How about 100,000? No, smaller. Maybe 10,000? Nope.
Surprisingly enough, for a population of about one million people, we would only need to survey 384 people to get a reliable answer. There are specific factors we have to consider regarding who to pick, making sure all pockets of the population are included, and the quality of the research basis, but if we can satisfy all those factors, we only have to talk to 384 people total.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)I know here in Western PA it has made a lot of my conservative friends and family think really hard.
Democracy started in Philadelphia in 1775.
Democracy will be saved here in 2020.
Vote for decency and honor - Vote Joe & Kamala.
GOTV!!!!!!
marble falls
(57,075 posts)way around until Nov3 midnite.
BootinUp
(47,139 posts)Boogiemack
(1,406 posts)they are supposed to serve and protect.