Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 12:06 PM Sep 2020

There is a simple technical solution to prevent cross-talk at a debate: a chess-clock.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_clock

---

It's simple:

* Each candidate gets 30 minutes of total time.

* A candidate's microphone is on if the moderator (during Q&A) or his opponent (during back-and-forth) presses a button. You cannot activate your own microphone.

* There would be no set time-limit how much time you get to spend on a particular answer. You spend your time as you see fit. While your microphone is on, your time runs down.

* Once you are finished with your answer, you press a button: Your microphone gets deactivated, your countdown is paused, the opponent's microphone is activated and his countdown continues.

* If your time runs out before the debate is over, well, that's your fault. Your microphone is now turned off permanently.





Your opponent's microphone is turned off automatically if your's is turned on and vice versa. Good luck shouting from the other side of the stage.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There is a simple technical solution to prevent cross-talk at a debate: a chess-clock. (Original Post) DetlefK Sep 2020 OP
Won't work. Laelth Sep 2020 #1
True Miguelito Loveless Sep 2020 #2
He can talk as much as he wants, because his microphone would be turned off. DetlefK Sep 2020 #4
nope - see my post #5. consider_this Sep 2020 #7
Yep - I said this elsewhere, consider_this Sep 2020 #5
Silly to put them in the same physical space. lagomorph777 Sep 2020 #11
much better! consider_this Sep 2020 #16
And he won't willingly turn his own mic off. calimary Sep 2020 #9
Ok - then he can leave the last words to Biden. lagomorph777 Sep 2020 #14
Not willingly. calimary Sep 2020 #17
Nope, but the timer would run out, and he's done. lagomorph777 Sep 2020 #19
The timer running out would have to kill his mic. calimary Sep 2020 #21
Yes, it would kill his mic. Then we could laugh as he gesticulates wildly and mouths obscenities. lagomorph777 Oct 2020 #22
Speaking of chess... Cirque du So-What Sep 2020 #3
good analogy! consider_this Sep 2020 #6
PERFECT! Stinky The Clown Sep 2020 #13
Yep. That's about it. calimary Sep 2020 #18
I'm in favor of wiring them with electrodes Trumpocalypse Sep 2020 #8
Even simpler: dispense with having them both on the same stage... JHB Sep 2020 #10
Yup - camera off, mic off. lagomorph777 Sep 2020 #15
Sound-proof booth freepotter Sep 2020 #12
In Brownie Girl Scouts, we used the Talking Stick Wicked Blue Sep 2020 #20

Laelth

(32,017 posts)
1. Won't work.
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 12:08 PM
Sep 2020

Trump will just keep talking. He will agree to rules, but he will never follow them.

-Laelth

consider_this

(2,203 posts)
5. Yep - I said this elsewhere,
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 12:11 PM
Sep 2020

that won't stop him from talking/yelling, and disrupting Joe or moderator as the are trying to speak. They are in the room, they will hear it all, whether TV audience does or not. But I also imagine his spew would get picked up bu the other mics too perhaps.

the only solution for him is a muzzle.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
11. Silly to put them in the same physical space.
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 12:19 PM
Sep 2020

Trump's COVID-infested entourage should be confined to the White House; Biden can stay wherever he wants, and the moderator can be in any convenient TV studio.

When it isn't Trump's turn, turn off his mic and camera

Cirque du So-What

(25,938 posts)
3. Speaking of chess...
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 12:10 PM
Sep 2020

Debating rump is rather like trying to play chess with a pigeon; it struts around, knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
10. Even simpler: dispense with having them both on the same stage...
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 12:17 PM
Sep 2020

...and have separate video feeds, Zoom-meeting style. Whoever's not "on" gets muted.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
15. Yup - camera off, mic off.
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 12:33 PM
Sep 2020

Though it might be amusing to see Turd gesticulating wildly and mouthing obscenities.

freepotter

(349 posts)
12. Sound-proof booth
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 12:22 PM
Sep 2020

Hell, put them in sound-proof booths where they can hear everything, but we can only hear the respondent when the moderator turns on the appropriate microphone. Used to use them in several game shows back in the 50's. Probably would have to put a lock on Dump's.

Wicked Blue

(5,832 posts)
20. In Brownie Girl Scouts, we used the Talking Stick
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 01:40 PM
Sep 2020

Years ago I was leader of a Brownie troop that my daughter was in. We used the Talking Stick tradition. Only the person holding the stick could talk and the others had to be quiet and listen. When a speaker finished, she handed the stick to the next person who wished to speak.

Nevertheless, I fear that in the Orange Traitor's case, he would hit Biden over the head with it instead of handing it over.





Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There is a simple technic...