Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmy Coney Barret formerly did legal work for an Iranian militant/terrorist group
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/barrett-supreme-court-mek/2020/09/29/da6b99ea-01ce-11eb-8879-7663b816bfa5_story.htmlJudge Barrett represented Iranian exile group in fight to end terrorist designation
Amy Coney Barrett, President Trumps nominee to join the Supreme Court, once represented an affiliate of an Iranian exile group as it challenged its State Department designation as a foreign terrorist organization.
Barrett disclosed her legal work for the group, which she undertook while employed at a law firm in Washington, in the Senate questionnaire she submitted during her 2017 confirmation process to join the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. The work did not come up in her confirmation hearing.
Barrett wrote that she was one of five lawyers on a team that represented the National Council of Resistance of Iran and its U.S. representative office from 2000 to 2001 in their petition to review the State Departments foreign-terrorist-organization designation.
The NCRI is affiliated with the Mujahideen-e Khalq (MEK), a onetime militant group comprising Iranian exiles who oppose Irans clerical regime. The Obama administration removed the group from the U.S. governments list of terrorist organizations in 2012. The MEK has faced accusations of cultlike practices, which the organization has disputed as smears
.Amy Coney Barrett, President Trumps nominee to join the Supreme Court, once represented an affiliate of an Iranian exile group as it challenged its State Department designation as a foreign terrorist organization.
Barrett disclosed her legal work for the group, which she undertook while employed at a law firm in Washington, in the Senate questionnaire she submitted during her 2017 confirmation process to join the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. The work did not come up in her confirmation hearing.
Barrett wrote that she was one of five lawyers on a team that represented the National Council of Resistance of Iran and its U.S. representative office from 2000 to 2001 in their petition to review the State Departments foreign-terrorist-organization designation.
The NCRI is affiliated with the Mujahideen-e Khalq (MEK), a onetime militant group comprising Iranian exiles who oppose Irans clerical regime. The Obama administration removed the group from the U.S. governments list of terrorist organizations in 2012. The MEK has faced accusations of cultlike practices, which the organization has disputed as smears
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 689 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amy Coney Barret formerly did legal work for an Iranian militant/terrorist group (Original Post)
CousinIT
Oct 2020
OP
Would this be considered, as the old repub mantra that we used to hear on a daily basis,
DEbluedude
Oct 2020
#3
StevieM
(10,500 posts)1. This group is totally hated inside on Iran.
They sided with Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq War.
The one thing that every Iranian agrees on is that they all hate the MEK.
Ohiogal
(31,999 posts)2. Someone didn't do their job vetting this candidate very well, did they?
DEbluedude
(816 posts)3. Would this be considered, as the old repub mantra that we used to hear on a daily basis,
"palling around with terrorists"?