Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Probably the only time I'll agree with Sirota... (Original Post) brooklynite Oct 2020 OP
If you invest that $50 million you could run such a newsroom indefinitely. Probably do lot more too. BSdetect Oct 2020 #1
I am surprised to see this posted here. Ferrets are Cool Oct 2020 #2
I think it's just an economics cost-benefit analysis. Mike 03 Oct 2020 #4
How is that a right wing talking point? SharonClark Oct 2020 #7
Still bleating over that? BannonsLiver Oct 2020 #3
I thought the latest polls Turin_C3PO Oct 2020 #5
McConnell + 7, McConnell +15, McConnell +12 brooklynite Oct 2020 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author melman Oct 2020 #6
So... genxlib Oct 2020 #9

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
4. I think it's just an economics cost-benefit analysis.
Thu Oct 1, 2020, 05:00 PM
Oct 2020


Imagine if that money had gone to one of the senate candidates in a tight race, like Harrison in SC.

Although, I'm no fan of Sirota, BTW.

Response to brooklynite (Original post)

genxlib

(5,542 posts)
9. So...
Thu Oct 1, 2020, 05:03 PM
Oct 2020

Who said a "$5-million-a-year newsroom" is worth a damn.

That doesn't sound like nearly enough money to run a professional TV operation. Nevermind the capital cost to get one up and running.

That wouldn't pay for one name brand anchor.

What's really the point of this other than to shit on the Democrats trying to expand the playing field?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Probably the only time I'...