Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Probably the only time I'll agree with Sirota... (Original Post)
brooklynite
Oct 2020
OP
BSdetect
(9,048 posts)1. If you invest that $50 million you could run such a newsroom indefinitely. Probably do lot more too.
Ferrets are Cool
(22,606 posts)2. I am surprised to see this posted here.
Seems to be a right wing talking point. But what the hell do I know.
Mike 03
(18,690 posts)4. I think it's just an economics cost-benefit analysis.
Imagine if that money had gone to one of the senate candidates in a tight race, like Harrison in SC.
Although, I'm no fan of Sirota, BTW.
SharonClark
(10,497 posts)7. How is that a right wing talking point?
BannonsLiver
(20,316 posts)3. Still bleating over that?
Turin_C3PO
(16,385 posts)5. I thought the latest polls
had Amy McGrath and McConnell pretty evenly matched?
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)8. McConnell + 7, McConnell +15, McConnell +12
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
melman This message was self-deleted by its author.
genxlib
(6,105 posts)9. So...
Who said a "$5-million-a-year newsroom" is worth a damn.
That doesn't sound like nearly enough money to run a professional TV operation. Nevermind the capital cost to get one up and running.
That wouldn't pay for one name brand anchor.
What's really the point of this other than to shit on the Democrats trying to expand the playing field?
