Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uponit7771

(93,532 posts)
Fri Oct 2, 2020, 10:22 AM Oct 2020

FDA issues warning on accuracy of Abbott's rapid coronavirus test after study finds false negatives

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/14/fda-data-suggests-abbotts-rapid-coronavirus-diagnostic-test-is-delivering-inaccurate-results.html

The study, which has not been peer-reviewed, found Abbott’s ID NOW test missed a third of samples collected with nasopharyngeal swabs that tested positive with a test from rival Cepheid. When using samples collected with “dry nasal swabs,” the Abbott test missed more than 48% of positive cases, the study said. Both nasopharyngeal swabs and dry nasal swabs are collected from the nostril, but the former is inserted much deeper into the nose.


Trump is maniacal and sociopathic not a complete moron, he's always looking to do dirt and benefit himself.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FDA issues warning on accuracy of Abbott's rapid coronavirus test after study finds false negatives (Original Post) uponit7771 Oct 2020 OP
Womp womp!!! ResistantAmerican17 Oct 2020 #1
The PCR tests give a good indication if you are infected, if it comes back positive still_one Oct 2020 #2
Correct, they Abbot test weren't PCR test IINM uponit7771 Oct 2020 #3
I think they relied heavily on that, and if the Abbott test was negative they judged everything was still_one Oct 2020 #4
 

still_one

(98,883 posts)
4. I think they relied heavily on that, and if the Abbott test was negative they judged everything was
Fri Oct 2, 2020, 11:21 AM
Oct 2020

ok, which is very bad mistake

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FDA issues warning on acc...