General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Mitt's campaign has a 'no whining rule'"? (LOL!)
by Hunter
Sheesh:
Fox & Friends co-host Steve Doocy asked (senior campaign adviser Ed Gillespie) whether he believes the media will convince Republicans that there is no point in voting this November because of recent polling that shows Romney down in a number of key swing states.
Ed, do you buy into this theory, and there are some people on the right who say, look, mainstream media is going to talk down Romney's chances of winning. They're going to show Mr. Obama way up in the polls just to tamp down enthusiasm so Republicans go, You know, why even bother voting because it's a foregone conclusion the guys going to get four more years? Doocy said.
Well," Gillespie replied, "we have a no whining rule in Boston about coverage in the media. We just deal with the facts.
A no whining rule? Oh, sure they do. No question about it. Well, except for the time ...
- more -
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/26/1136700/-Ed-Gillespie-says-Mitt-s-campaign-has-a-no-whining-rule-Not-sure-he-knows-what-that-means
Mitt's campaign is whine central.
LOL!!! Romney To Obama: Truce? Asks That Business Record, Taxes Be Off-Limits
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021106010
Top Romney aide whines that Mitt's the victim of big bad Barack Obama
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021104746
LOL! Mitt's campaign whining about Ohio polls
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021413271
Romney campaign whining about the polls
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021104504
Romney Blames Obama for His Campaign Challenges
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021403906
SunsetDreams
(8,571 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Typos abound.
aletier_v
(1,773 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)Why not just be honest and say, "Whining is required, but no facts allowed"?
central scrutinizer
(12,654 posts)nm
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)...but Mitt is a Mormon and his church has a strong "NO WINING" rule.

surrealAmerican
(11,879 posts)They just don't follow their own rules any better than the usual rules.
GOTV
(3,759 posts)... I mean who goes out to vote when they believe it can have no effect? If the polls convince me that Romney can't lose, why go out to vote? Why lift an unnecessary finger if doing so cannot get the result I want?
Same if the polls convince me Obama can't lose. Even if that's the result I want, I can just stay home and get the president I want. Who does extra work?
In my case none of this really applies because 1 - I think Obama can still lose, 2 - I vote by mail and so I don't have the benefit of knowing what the polling will look like on election day and 3 - I live in Ohio so I will of course make every effort to vote. No. Matter. What.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)if the polls show a candidate losing badly, people are likely to stay home believing their vote is irrelevant.
The message when a candidate is winning should be: Let's make this happen.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)By Aviva Shen
As nearly every major public opinion poll puts President Obama ahead of Mitt Romney, conservative pundits new favorite accusation is that the polls are biased because the media is oversampling Democrats. On Thursday, Romneys senior adviser, Eric Fehrnstrom, repeated this line on Fox News to explain why the polls couldnt be trusted:
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/09/27/920301/top-romney-adviser-some-of-these-polls-have-been-called-into-question/