Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 07:21 PM Sep 2012

"Mitt's campaign has a 'no whining rule'"? (LOL!)

Ed Gillespie says Mitt's campaign has a 'no whining rule'. Not sure he knows what that means.

by Hunter

Sheesh:

“Fox & Friends” co-host Steve Doocy asked (senior campaign adviser Ed Gillespie) whether he believes the media will convince Republicans that there is no point in voting this November because of recent polling that shows Romney down in a number of key swing states.

“Ed, do you buy into this theory, and there are some people on the right who say, look, mainstream media is going to talk down Romney's chances of winning. They're going to show Mr. Obama way up in the polls just to tamp down enthusiasm so Republicans go, ‘You know, why even bother voting because it's a foregone conclusion the guy’s going to get four more years?’” Doocy said.

“Well," Gillespie replied, "we have a no whining rule in Boston about coverage in the media. We just deal with the facts.”

A no whining rule? Oh, sure they do. No question about it. Well, except for the time ...

- more -

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/26/1136700/-Ed-Gillespie-says-Mitt-s-campaign-has-a-no-whining-rule-Not-sure-he-knows-what-that-means

Mitt's campaign is whine central.

LOL!!! Romney To Obama: Truce? Asks That Business Record, Taxes Be Off-Limits
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021106010

Top Romney aide whines that Mitt's the victim of big bad Barack Obama
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021104746

LOL! Mitt's campaign whining about Ohio polls
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021413271

Romney campaign whining about the polls
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021104504

Romney Blames Obama for His Campaign Challenges
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021403906



14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Mitt's campaign has a 'no whining rule'"? (LOL!) (Original Post) ProSense Sep 2012 OP
STOP IT!!! This is hard nt SunsetDreams Sep 2012 #1
They meant a no not whining rule alcibiades_mystery Sep 2012 #2
I think he said "No WINNING rule". aletier_v Sep 2012 #3
That was the first thing that came to my mind! etherealtruth Sep 2012 #6
that would explain a lot Enrique Sep 2012 #11
Doubly funny when paired with "We just deal with the facts” pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #4
We're not going to have our whining dictated by fact-checkers central scrutinizer Sep 2012 #8
And we're not going to have our "facts" questioned by reality-based people!1!! pinboy3niner Sep 2012 #9
Don't like bringing up religion... DreamGypsy Sep 2012 #5
They DO SO have a "no whining" rule. surrealAmerican Sep 2012 #7
I never understand this reasoning. Doesn't blow out poll numbers reduce turnout on both sides ... GOTV Sep 2012 #10
Overthinking. By the same token, ProSense Sep 2012 #13
Oh Lo'dy! M_M Sep 2012 #12
Whining about polls reach EPIC FAIL level ProSense Sep 2012 #14

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
4. Doubly funny when paired with "We just deal with the facts”
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 07:28 PM
Sep 2012

Why not just be honest and say, "Whining is required, but no facts allowed"?

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
5. Don't like bringing up religion...
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 07:32 PM
Sep 2012

...but Mitt is a Mormon and his church has a strong "NO WINING" rule.

surrealAmerican

(11,879 posts)
7. They DO SO have a "no whining" rule.
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 07:34 PM
Sep 2012

They just don't follow their own rules any better than the usual rules.

GOTV

(3,759 posts)
10. I never understand this reasoning. Doesn't blow out poll numbers reduce turnout on both sides ...
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 10:40 AM
Sep 2012

... I mean who goes out to vote when they believe it can have no effect? If the polls convince me that Romney can't lose, why go out to vote? Why lift an unnecessary finger if doing so cannot get the result I want?

Same if the polls convince me Obama can't lose. Even if that's the result I want, I can just stay home and get the president I want. Who does extra work?

In my case none of this really applies because 1 - I think Obama can still lose, 2 - I vote by mail and so I don't have the benefit of knowing what the polling will look like on election day and 3 - I live in Ohio so I will of course make every effort to vote. No. Matter. What.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
13. Overthinking. By the same token,
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 10:47 AM
Sep 2012

if the polls show a candidate losing badly, people are likely to stay home believing their vote is irrelevant.

The message when a candidate is winning should be: Let's make this happen.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
14. Whining about polls reach EPIC FAIL level
Thu Sep 27, 2012, 02:22 PM
Sep 2012
Top Romney Adviser: ‘Some Of These Polls Have Been Called Into Question’

By Aviva Shen

As nearly every major public opinion poll puts President Obama ahead of Mitt Romney, conservative pundits’ new favorite accusation is that the polls are biased because the media is oversampling Democrats. On Thursday, Romney’s senior adviser, Eric Fehrnstrom, repeated this line on Fox News to explain why the polls couldn’t be trusted:

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/09/27/920301/top-romney-adviser-some-of-these-polls-have-been-called-into-question/
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Mitt's campaign has...