No Symptoms, no temperature, vitals stable. Question, IS HE STILL TESTING POSTIVIE?

[still_one]

I know they won't answer "when he last tested negative", then ask if he is testing positive?

[PTWB]

1. They're lying. He's still symptomatic.

[ananda]

3. Of course he is. And still on steroids.

When he weans off the steroids, then we'll
know something. Not till then, except that
he's more mental than usual.

[LonePirate]

5. Until there is live video footage of him, I would not believe any written statement by the WH.

[Eyeball_Kid]

2. Of course he'd test positive. That's why they haven't announced it yet. n/t

And he might not test negative for more than a week from now, IF he's going to recover. He's on the steroid high and he might be in the eye of the hurricane. He can just as likely fall off the survival cliff, but if he doesn't, he's got permanent organic damage.

[still_one]

6. I understand, but I want them to specifically answer that question. They are saying they have

detected antibodies, which has nothing to do with whether he is still shedding virus or not

Testing positive would be a good indicator of that

[PTWB]

10. They injected him with antibodies ...

Seems like the detection of said antibodies was inevitable.

[still_one]

11. That is true, and the fact that they didn't distinguish the type of antibodies leaves more questions

[liberalmuse]

4. They will hop him up on drugs so he can campaign.

The campaign is leaking money like a sieve and they need him out there. The doctors will say "He's had 3 days without symptoms. He's safe to hold rallies again."

[maryellen99]

8. And I bet he will collapse in front of his supporters nt

[liberalmuse]

22. And they will all rush to give him mouth-to-mouth.

[still_one]

15. I want them to say he is testing negative twice in a 48 hour period

[SWBTATTReg]

7. The safer bet is to assume that YES, he is. He hasn't provided a shred of evidence stating that he

did test positive for the coronavirus anyways to begin with (he is trying to get people to feel sorry for him and thus vote for him, which I think backfired big time for him).

I wouldn't get closer than 10' to him, and really, the best choice is to NOT debate trump and let trump have a forum to vent his ranting and raving.

trump will lie and sprout nonsense as usual, and won't let Mr. Biden even speak (but Mr. Biden is a good debater), I am sure that the powers that be surrounding Mr. Biden are fully aware of the pitfalls awaiting debating the POS in the WH. It's a shame that trump has soiled this entire process, the debates, the long standing tradition of friendly, one on one debates that have been around for so long.

[Iliyah]

9. Has shithole . . . .

appeared yet?

He is very much symptomatic.

[cwydro]

12. That's what I keep wondering.

Surely he’d show himself if he were healthy.

[Hugin]

13. Hmm... No temperature? Does that mean ambient?

You're always second guessing yourself with these guys.

[still_one]

14. I probably misheard and they said no fever, but you are right, it is always second guessing with

them

[Hugin]

16. There's always the risk they're only re-reporting the Metastasizing Mussolini's self-reports...

such as was done yesterday.

Entirely fiction.

[still_one]

24. lol

[lagomorph777]

28. Ambient!

Ouch!

[GeorgeGist]

17. No bullshit?

[Docreed2003]

18. I can tell you that it may be a while before he tests negative

We've had patient who tested positive with symptoms who continue to "test positive" for weeks after they've shown symptoms. That's actually very common.

[Grammy23]

19. If he was able, they'd have him in front of a camera or they'd, at least,

Have a new video of him.

He is too unreliable to put out for a live appearance. Even a taped video is iffy.

So they have him off camera, hidden. And they give vague information about his vital signs. Stable suggests not moving around wildly but could still mean consistently too high or too low. They do not want his true condition known nor do they want anything leading up to his diagnosis with Covid known. If we knew he knowingly went to an event/debate/ fund raiser knowing he was positive for Covid, that might be problematic. So all we get are crickets.

All of this will eventually leak out, it always does. They are just delaying the inevitable. As for tRump himself, they may very well have him sedated so he can cause less commotion. Interesting times we are in. I Don’t think we can say the times are stable.

[Hugin]

21. Zero seems pretty stable to me.

A very stable number. Little change... Ever.

[Jim__]

20. What does "vitals stable" mean?

I know pulse rate and respiration rate are usually included in vitals, sometimes blood pressure. Does stable mean they are remaining relatively constant? Or that they are within a defined normal range? Or something else?

I'm curious because if he's been manic, say, his pulse rate, may be staying within some range, but that range could be high.

[LizBeth]

23. Simple yes or no. Positive or negative. That will be all I trust anything else is propaganda.

[still_one]

25. No ambiguity there

[LizBeth]

31. +1. They lie. This is what you do with liars. And the good test not that one that has false negative

[PoindexterOglethorpe]

26. And let's not forget he was supposed to address the nation last night.

That he didn't, strongly suggests he was not up to it.

[Squinch]

27. If that's what they're saying, we know that those three things are not true.

But that's all we know.

[Wounded Bear]

29. Hell, we don't know if he's still alive...

His tweets could be a chat bot for all we know.

Random Batshit Text Generator set to 10.

[SlogginThroughIt]

30. That isn't how it works.

He will test positive for 90 days likely. Testing positive after being positive isn’t the metric about whether or not you can go in public