HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Two debates now and neith...

Wed Oct 7, 2020, 10:13 PM

Two debates now and neither of our candidates has brought up Merrick Garland

with respect to Barrett.

I really donít get it.

7 replies, 462 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply Two debates now and neither of our candidates has brought up Merrick Garland (Original post)
BeyondGeography Oct 2020 OP
flying rabbit Oct 2020 #1
Stallion Oct 2020 #2
still_one Oct 2020 #3
Stargleamer Oct 2020 #4
MissB Oct 2020 #5
BeyondGeography Oct 2020 #6
MissB Oct 2020 #7

Response to BeyondGeography (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2020, 10:14 PM

1. Yeah.

I wonder why.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BeyondGeography (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2020, 10:16 PM

2. That May Be the First Argument I Thought Kamala Didn't Knock out of Park

Republicans have packed the Court by breaking traditional rules. It was a good answer-could have been more complete

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BeyondGeography (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2020, 10:16 PM

3. Indirectly Harris said we are in an election, and the people should choose the next president who

Be on the SC

But you are right, she should have brought up Garland


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BeyondGeography (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2020, 10:16 PM

4. it's like their prior debate coaching

told them not to go there. But it seems that they some downside to it, that escapes me.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BeyondGeography (Original post)

Wed Oct 7, 2020, 10:17 PM

5. That's more on McConnell than on Trump

Imo

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MissB (Reply #5)

Wed Oct 7, 2020, 10:19 PM

6. The point is they set a precedent in 2016 about election year nominations to the Supreme Court

Not only that, Barrett herself went on Fox and said Garland would replace a conservative and change the balance of the Court. Thereís no excuse for not pointing these things out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to BeyondGeography (Reply #6)

Wed Oct 7, 2020, 10:20 PM

7. Oh yes definitely agree

Kamalaís point about Lincoln was a bit too abstract. She couldíve been more direct

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread