General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOLD NEWS / OPINION. Federalist Society calls for 2nd impeachment
Last edited Fri Oct 9, 2020, 12:53 PM - Edit history (1)
Steven Calabresi, cofounder of the conservative Federalist Society, called for a second impeachment inquiry into President Trump in a New York Times opinion piece on Thursday after a tweet earlier in the day from Trump where he falsely characterized mail-in voting and proposed the delay of the 2020 presidential election in November, which the executive branch cannot enact.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattperez/2020/07/30/cofounder-of-conservative-federalist-society-calls-for-president-trump-to-be-impeached/
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)still_one
(92,187 posts)Le Roi de Pot
(744 posts)They want to create distance
still_one
(92,187 posts)iluvtennis
(19,852 posts)W T F
(1,146 posts)Article II states that The President shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.
rsdsharp
(9,170 posts)could pardon Trump for federal crimes hes committed.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)Not crimes not part of the impeachment.
Trump is a criminal on so many fronts. He needs to go to jail. Of course, the likelihood of that seems infinitesimal, impeachment or not, win or lose the election.
I will be thrilled to be proven wrong about that.
rsdsharp
(9,170 posts)the restriction applies only to the impeachment itself.
W T F
(1,146 posts)That would allow impeachment but no prosecution for crimes impeach for. That doesnt give equal protection under the law, and Its hard to imagine that the founding fathers had that in mind when they wrote that exception.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)But what you're saying seems to agree with what I'm saying.
Then again, my brain has been broken by trying to make sense of reality these days.
COL Mustard
(5,897 posts)What I think will happen is DJT will be roundly defeated in the election, and he'll go apeshit. When that happens, the Senate will have nothing to lose, and they'll support removal under the 25th Amendment. I think McConnell, Graham, Collins and maybe McSally will lose (at least I hope most of them do), and they'll have nothing to lose by turning on Trump, whom they'll blame for their electoral losses. Vengeance will be sweet....of course, I could be wrong.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)FBaggins
(26,732 posts)A guy who was co-founder of the Yale chapter made such a call months ago.
Baitball Blogger
(46,703 posts)Are they the coaches in a football game? If so, was he their quarterback in their quest for a much sought out goal? If that's the case, here's my metaphor: It's like giving the order to sack your own quarterback after he's already thrown the winning Hail Mary.
highplainsdem
(48,975 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)Beachnutt
(7,321 posts)LudwigPastorius
(9,139 posts)eight months before this article, he was defending Trump against his impeachment for extorting foreign election aid from Ukraine, and calling the Mueller investigation "illegal".
So after careful deliberation, I'm still going to have to say that Steve can go fuck himself with an immersion blender.
Illumination
(2,458 posts)running loose!...:
paleotn
(17,912 posts)Sorry, I ain't taking that bait. I don't trust neo-fascists as far as I can throw their doughy white asses.