General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Democratic Party. Where men are men and the women are too.
According to a study by UCLA reported on in the WaTi
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-politics/2012/sep/27/study-female-gop-politicians-look-more-feminine/
Edit: ooops!
Walk away
(9,494 posts)get the red out
(14,031 posts)Looking more feminine? Having crazy-eyes like Bachman?
This is completely idiotic and meaningless.
DURHAM D
(33,054 posts)Sanddancer
(52 posts)They're called 'assholes'.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)FSogol
(47,623 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Kingofalldems
(40,276 posts)the Moonie times is RW, then you have another OP with them as a source.
sarge43
(29,173 posts)Also says something about male Democrats who have the smarts to vote for the abilities rather than the appearance.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)to rule?
Yeah, low information voters would vote for someone who is "cuter," but dare I say all of the people here vote based on issues, not fashion, or appearance. You know a lot of the time people use appearance to hide the fact there is no content inside. They look good on the outside, but the inside is hollow.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)to be made?
Or is 'ooops!' your entire repertoire?
Sanddancer
(52 posts)Look. It's a silly frivolous study picked up by a right wing paper that decides to go with "our women a more feminine (pretty?) than yours." When equally they could have gone with (Ha!) "Republican men are a bunch of "Lady Boys."
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)humorous.
Sanddancer
(52 posts)ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)you obviously don't know what is humorous and what isn't. Did anybody that posted in this thread find it funny? I don't think so.