Dr. Sean Conley says Trump "is no longer considered a transmission risk to others" based on a PCR te

[soothsayer]

Link to tweet

?s=21

Link to tweet

?s=21

Just in: Dr. Sean Conley says Trump “is no longer considered a transmission risk to others” based on a PCR test conducted this morning


Eric Feigl-Ding
@DrEricDing
·
Oct 10, 2020
Replying to @JDiamond1
Conley cites CDC criteria, yet CDC clearly says severe #COVID19 cases are infectious for 20 days. And his viral load might be down, but he also has synthetic antibodies. Synthetic doesn’t equal immunity. And dexamethasone corticosteroid means even longer infectiousness.
Image
Image

Eric Feigl-Ding
@DrEricDing
Ps. Also notice Conley never said PCR was negative.

Eric Feigl-Ding
@DrEricDing
Replying to @DrEricDing
2) Notice that Conley never says PCR test is negative. He just says higher Ct value is correlated with lower viral load. But he never said zero viral load. And again, it could just be suppressed by the synthetic monoclonal antibody and Remdesivir, not true immunity.

[CatMor]

1. I still wouldn't go near him with a ten foot pole.

[spanone]

2. I don't believe a word from the con

[brush]

3. I trust that doctor about as much as I trust trump.

[LisaL]

4. In other words, Trump is still testing positive.

NT

[PatSeg]

8. So it would seem

If Trump had tested negative, I'm sure Doc Conley would have said that. These people just can't tell the truth.

[steve2470]

5. I damn sure don't trust that doctor

If a doctor with Dr. Fauci's impeccable reputation says he is no longer infectious...then I will believe it. Not a second before. Trump and all his people are liars.

[Andy823]

6. He says whatever trump tells him to say

trump writes the script for all of the people he sends out to speak. Letting trump go out in public will not be good for those he comes in contact with.

He could only last for 18 minutes today, I am not sure he will even try to do a "real" rally.

[LisaL]

7. Or a 90 minute debate at which he is supposed to stand.

NT

[Deuxcents]

9. This doc has no credibility

We used to call “doctors” like this quacks. I don’t feel sorry for this guy at all.

[Mossfern]

10. Or...

This was all a hoax to begin with.

Yes, I'm going there because the world is bat shit crazy anyway.

[icymist]

11. Ah, so the doctor, too is keeping positive? Well, in a way...

Link to tweet

[JDC]

12. Is this the PR Quack speaking or the NDA he signed?

[crickets]

13. Horse hockey.

Notice that Conley never says PCR test is negative.

Exactly.

[FM123]

14. I don't trust anything that "Doctor" Conley has to say

I would trust Dr. Scholl the shoe guy before I would ever trust Conley.....

[JI7]

15. Conley was probably bought off the day he got this job

Wasn't it Ronny Jackson that helped in getting him to replace him ?

[LiberalFighter]

16. The AMA needs to update their criteria to include ethics.

[RainCaster]

17. Isn't that the test with 30% false negatives?

No wonder DFT likes it so much.

[still_one]

20. Not the PCR test, though there can be false negatives, it isn't anywhere near 30%. The question

the needs to be asked is how many cycles did it take when the PCR test was given

[still_one]

18. I would like to know the number of cycles it took on the PCR test

[helpisontheway]

19. Liar..Biden better stay far away from that himHis cult

members feel free to go to his hateful rallies.