General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf consumer goods ads must meet factual requirements, why not political ads?
Papa Johns was sued over Better Ingredients, Better Pizza
Red Bull was sued over It gives you wings
Yet political ads can be horribly misleading and flat-out lying
I wouldnt mind seeing a Fairness Doctrine-esque commission that reviews all ads for misleading and false claims
THREE ads in FL attacking a Democratic State Senator are what triggered this thought:
Heres an article about one (Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee just broadcast the same ad, too)
Republican Brodeur and new group launch false attacks on Democrat Sigman in key Senate race
https://www.orlandosentinel.com/politics/2020-election/os-ne-sigman-attack-ad-20200903-46yenbgavvelpayowfzahvobi4-story.html
The mailers quote from Politico and Washington Post stories about the Democratic Party of Florida receiving $780,000 in Paycheck Protection Program, or PPP, loans earlier this year.
But the stories dont mention Sigman, because neither she nor her campaign received any PPP money. Senate Victory, the Democratic-affiliated political committee that has backed Sigman, also did not receive any PPP money from the state party, which is a legally separate entity.
The party returned the money in July after receiving criticism from Democrats and Republicans alike.
Yes. There have been THREE separate ads from different groups, all pushing the same lie
Ferrets are Cool
(21,109 posts)Just a guess.
edited for spelling
Roland99
(53,342 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(21,109 posts)They are selling an ideals and beliefs.
Ms. Toad
(34,085 posts)Political speech i sgranted significantly more protection than commercial speech.