She is just not going

[VivaResitance]

to answer any questions about ANY case. This is all for show.

What is the point.

[spanone]

1. to point out that very fact.

[dem4decades]

2. Ask her about things she had said in the past, can she deny things she had said?

[Bettie]

4. She's a white wing fundamentalist

of course she'll lie and say "I never said that" because that is what they do. They lie.

[dem4decades]

6. Then let her lie, under oath, on camera.

[Bettie]

8. Kavenaugh did

and he received zero consequences.


They get to lie with impunity, meanwhile, our side makes a misstatement and the press is all over it for a week.

It is frustrating.

[dem4decades]

10. Yep, i can't watch it.

[VivaResitance]

3. Its the same

crap that Kavanaugh pulled last time.

[SlogginThroughIt]

5. We need to delegitimize the court.

[dware]

7. No nominee is going to say how they will rule if a case comes before them,

I've watched a lot of confirmation hearings, R and D, and I've yet to hear a nominee say how they would rule on a case that might come before the court.

[Newest Reality]

9. All we need to know...

Is that she is a corporate shill and leans theocratic.

Her record shows a strong bias in that, IMHO.

[Mike 03]

11. SCOTUS confirmation hearings used to be so stimulating to

watch. They would talk about cases. Now it's just the same bullshit.

Amy Barrett is a lightweight like I've never seen come before this Committee before.