Good grief Feinstein!!! Barrett HAS expressed her view on abortion in A PUbLIC newspaper!!!

[Ninga]

She already has stated her views!!

WHAT A MISSED OPPORTUNITY,

[madaboutharry]

1. It may be a lay up for further questions from other Senators.

They coordinated their questioning.

[Ninga]

5. I hope to our heavenly earth mother you are right....

[dem4decades]

2. Feinstein isn't my favorite, there are better questioners.

[Mossfern]

3. She's bringing up Roe again.

Barrett is stonewalling.

[Baltimike]

4. But NOW she's under oath. Leave DiFi alone. nt

[Ninga]

8. Excuse me? She is an esteemed Senator and each esteemed Senator should ask Barrett why her

name appeared in such an anti abortion newspaper ad.

It would not be out of line for each Senator asked her. My expectations are not out of order.

[Baltimike]

9. You're excused...but DiFi has her under oath, so she's asking because of that. nt

[Ninga]

10. I get it, believe me. My nerves are frayed and I want this nominee's feet held to the fire on that

newspaper ad. It’s her public declaration.

I know she will be seated. I am sick about it. I need to calm down.

[Baltimike]

13. If she lies under oath, we can impeach her later.

Kavanaugh lied under oath too.

They can only set the table for later.

[Baltimike]

14. Oh, and I only have it on in the other room, I can't stand to watch it

so I really, really empathize with you.

I hate this too.

[Mike Nelson]

6. I think...

... she admitted the abortion/Roe issue is open to review.

[Mike 03]

7. A lot of Americans may be watching this who know little to nothing

about Barrett, so IMO Feinstein is doing her job.

[NorthOf270]

11. Imagine Adam Schiff, Katie Porter or Ted Lieu questioning her n/m

[ProudMNDemocrat]

12. The answer is YES...ACB does agree with Scalia on Roe being wrongly decided.

She just will not admit it.

Expect Kamala Harris, Corey Booker, and Amy Klobuchar to press ACB further on that.

[JohnQFunk]

15. Senate Dems repeating their past mistakes. Feinstein and every other DEM should have...

… given their time to Sen. Kamala Harris - and let her grill Barrett as a hostile witness.

Get Barrett to talk about executive branch issues - starting with the emoluments clause. In depth. To the point that Harris gets Barrett to say things that will either prompt Trump to withdraw her nomination or demonstrate that Barrett is a Trump Regime meatpuppet.