General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLooks like I'm not the only black woman who noticed Barrett's condescending tone toward Kamala
Link to tweet
rurallib
(62,411 posts)Walleye
(31,017 posts)I thought she condescended to Sen. Booker and Sen. Hirono as well. Maybe Im being overly sensitive
George II
(67,782 posts)..."I'm quoting you!"
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Tumbulu
(6,278 posts)I did not catch it listening to NPR, but when watching it, wow- very obvious to me.
I just was infuriated be her condescension and rudeness.
Contrast how she replied to Senator Feinstein to see it visible on display.
dchill
(38,482 posts)Spazito
(50,326 posts)when she was responding to Kamala. It was disgusting and revealed just who Barrett really is, a rabid right wing bigot, imo.
Olafjoy
(937 posts)She was absolutely the rudest and most condescending and sarcastic to Kamala. ❤️❤️❤️ How conehead walked right into Kamalas trap of admitting that she thought climate change was debatable. Also, she is a law professor and doesnt know the 5 freedoms protected by the First Amendment?
Walleye
(31,017 posts)barbtries
(28,789 posts)who doesn't know the constitution. ain't that a kick in the ass
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)who is WAY smarter than she is
hlthe2b
(102,236 posts)I've dealt with "holier than thou," yet barely qualified (or fully unqualified) and thus insecure women being promoted to push the agendas of the men in power all my life. She is the epitome of it. Many a woman professional fights the urge to conclude that women can be (and often are) our worse enemies in the workplace as a result.
But yeah, I do think there is some deeply rooted racism in her makeup as well. She tried to appear more pleasant with Corey Booker (and hell he is so personable, why wouldn't you?), but her condescension came through there too.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Black children. It strikes me as horrible. I can't imagine what they must go through with her.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)She raved about the intelligence and talents of her white children while talking about her black children like they were charity cases.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Illumination
(2,458 posts)dysfunction in that family...
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)The way she spits Senator Harris was pretty striking.
She was probably also scared though if she watched Kamala destroy Kavanaugh.
Blaukraut
(5,693 posts)I noticed that right away. Not so with Klobuchar and Feinstein. She would always address them by their full title.
Big Blue Marble
(5,074 posts)She knew or had been warned to watch out for her questioning.
I saw both fear and contempt in her body language. She is livid that she has
to sit through these questioning by the Democrats when she is the golden gold
of the Right.
pwb
(11,261 posts)and his white wife?
Polybius
(15,398 posts)She had a condescending tone against the Senators who weren't afraid to hammer her with tough questions and statements, such as Harris and Amy Klobuchar. On the other hand, Dianne Feinstein, Chris Coons, and Cory Booker were super nice to her and are all very personable, so she was not condescending towards them. I'm not criticizing these three Senators in any way. They are incredibly good human beings, and have reached out towards the aisle many times.
Harris and Klobuchar on the other hand are no nonsense/no-BS type Senators. They are great debaters and don't sugar-coat things with Republicans. They know they are their adversaries, and don't want to be friends with them.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)You may not have experienced that particular rone and demeanor from white women, but I have - many many times - and so have other black women.
Not to say you haven't gotten shade from white women, but it may have been couched differently because of your gender. But black women recognized it from Barrett immediately.
Polybius
(15,398 posts)I live in a mostly white area too, so it can be tough. Anyway, in this instance, she gave the same tone to Amy, so she was consistent. She did not give that tone to Booker, Coons, or Feinstein, because they were exceptionally nice to her. Not to say Harris was at fault, just saying that she's a total no-BS type person, as is Amy. They don't pretend to be friends with Republicans.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Her manner toward Kamala was distinctly different than it was to any of the other white women or men speaking to her. And it wasn't because they were "nicer" to her than Kamala was. And her manner was different than it was with Amy.
I am certain you have experienced lots of racism from white women. Most black people have. But black women are treated differently than black men or white women are. We know it when we see it.
Bettie
(16,095 posts)she copped an attitude with all of the Democratic women, but with Senators Harris and Hirono she was particularly snotty.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Barretts voice is like nails on a chalkboard to me.
Any clips anywhere?
PunkinPi
(4,875 posts)But, the sentiment is accurate as many WOC (myself included) can attest.
Lonestarblue
(9,981 posts)Her weird little smile made me want to smack her. Barrett demonstrated only one thing that I saw or heard during these hearings. She is ignorant of the law but is thoroughly accomplished with her BS degree for using a lot of words and saying absolutely nothing.
George II
(67,782 posts)Nasruddin
(752 posts)Maybe Mrs Barrett will adopt a different tone at her impeachment hearing.
jaxexpat
(6,820 posts)I just gulped it down like rare scarce water in a relentlessly thirsty desert. Also, do look forward to ruminating over it and other tasty yet overdue images as the seasons proceed.
A toast, that some will find the new year VERY uncomfortable. Oh, and, cheers.
GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)Native
(5,942 posts)dalton99a
(81,471 posts)Hekate
(90,673 posts)My husband said her voice was like fingernails on a chalkboard, & neither of us wanted to have this performance on until we were sure it was over, so I just clicked in and out during the day with the mute on, hoping for a break.
Barrett is about as bad as she possibly can be, then.
She follows in the footsteps of nominations/appointments to the SCOTUS by the GOP that are blisteringly insulting to the intelligence of any thinking American like filling Thurgood Marshalls vacancy with Clarence Thomas. Now theyre going to fill Ruth Bader Ginsbergs vacancy with this appalling creature.
Thats a helluva legacy.
Iggo
(47,552 posts)Upthevibe
(8,042 posts)You are not the only person who noticed that. It's absolutely disgusting.....
speaknow
(321 posts)in tone but giving Senator Harris nasty looks.
Senator Harris is terrific and she's going to be
a great President. Stay safe Senator Harris, the Country
needs you!