General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOUR NEW MACHINES USE PAPER!!!!
I am ecstatic!!!
I didn't know our new voting machines print paper ballots to scan! Granted our little county doesn't matter much but it's a HUGE relief to have an auditable paper trail!
It's not perfect. To improve it the ballot should have a detachable part with a unique id printed on it that matches the ballot. Then voters could confirm their ballots are correctly counted and/or not lost.
EVERY voter should be able to vote like this.
Grasswire2
(13,849 posts)Or is it a bar code?
The gold standard:
Paper ballot, hand marked, VOTER VERIFIABLE. Strong ballot security, strong audit trail. NO wifi transmission, NO optical scan, NO modems.
Those are the must-haves.
HelpImSurrounded
(560 posts)Not the gold standard. Ballot is fed back into scanner, was so excited I didn't analyze if there were machine readable codes alongside the human readable text.
Our old machines were completely unauditable so I'm just excited by the improvement.
It's created a real opening to discuss how we get to that gold standard.
LiberalArkie
(19,820 posts)you can read what you what you voted for on the machines printed card. The card has bar codes to track it back to what machine actually printed it. (in case there is a problem with it). That card is then inserted into a reader to put your card (vote) into the system.
Grasswire2
(13,849 posts)A system that likely uses wifi transmission over a modem to get the tallies to central.
LiberalArkie
(19,820 posts)AC power. The clerk gives the voter a card that is configured when you come in with the items you will be voting on. The voter takes it to the human interface and sticks the card in. The voters options come up. when you are complete and verified that you are complete, the machine will print all your voting choices on the card.
The voter can check it at that point. I assume if there was a mistake, the voter can go back and get another card. But in any case, no vote is posted until the voter inserts the card into the tabulator. At this point is where fraud could take place.
LiberalArkie
(19,820 posts)which could give the same fraudulent total, or are that totaled by hand with human eyes and hands which would not.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)Without that... It would be just a hand count. Which I would fully support, BTW. Yet optical scan-able ballots can be verified, audited, and leave a paper trail.
Grasswire2
(13,849 posts)And that's one of the criteria.
targetpractice
(4,919 posts)Hand marked, hand counted, and hand tabulated ballots are the best method... And that worked perfectly fine for a few hundred years in the U.S. and elsewhere.
The technology doesn't really help in this situation.
bearsfootball516
(6,713 posts)The poll worker looks you up by name and prints off your ballot, which has a unique bar code in the corner. You insert that into the voting machine and it pulls up all of the races. You select your choices on the touch screen, then when you're done, it spits your ballot back out with all of your choices marked. Then you walk it over to the counting machine, insert it, and it gives you a "Your vote has been cast!" message, and the ballot drops into a lockbox that is saved in case of a manual recount.
Best part, no wifi connections whatsoever, so there's no ability for them to be hacked.
The scanners work really well too. There was a race last fall that the Republican ended up winning by like, 3 votes (GRRRR). They did a manual recount...and the vote count was identical to the tally the machines had.
Grasswire2
(13,849 posts)If not by modem?
bearsfootball516
(6,713 posts)Each machine has a chip that's removed with the votes on it. It's driven to a central location in Goshen, where all of the chips are inserted in a final counting machine and the final votes are tallied.
Grasswire2
(13,849 posts)...where the summary is, by law, posted outside the door of the polling place.
I'll bring info here.
HelpImSurrounded
(560 posts)No system is unhackable. But some are better than others. Ideally, ballot transport would be a group endeavor.
bearsfootball516
(6,713 posts)You can't hack into something that doesn't have an internet/wifi connection.
HelpImSurrounded
(560 posts)Hacking is a term that predates the internet and wifi. Loosely it means "making a system do what it's not intended to do." 90% of hacking is "social engineering" and takes place outside the computer.
When we talk about the Russians hacking the 2016 election, we are not talking about them connecting to voting machines and flipping bits or even the large data dumps they caused. In this case hacking refers to old fashioned psy-ops conducted via micro-targeting in social media. The russians hacked people, not computers.
In the case of the memory circuits used in some voting machines, they simply need to be isolated from other people - e.g. in a courier's car. Once isolated from view, they can be popped into a reader/writer and have their data changed. It would take about 5 minutes and then the "chip" would be delivered to the central location having been altered en route.
bearsfootball516
(6,713 posts)When it's time to remove the chip from the vote counting machine, both a Democratic and Republican clerk are there to witness it. The chip is dropped into a tamper proof black bag and sealed, and then is driven by the Democratic and Republican clerks to the central location, where they both escort the chip inside and insert it into the central counting machine.
Celerity
(54,448 posts)HelpImSurrounded
(560 posts)As I said, transport should be a group endeavor. Humans are both the weakest link in security and the best defense to security gaps.
diva77
(7,880 posts)That is but one of the many ways these machines are hackable.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)diva77
(7,880 posts)Last edited Fri Oct 16, 2020, 02:15 PM - Edit history (1)
designed to give the appearance of a paper ballot when it is actually just printing out code (either bar code or QR) which is nontransparent and does not guarantee that your vote will be counted as cast since the scanner will read the code and not whatever marking you made. These are no better than the paperless DREs, and in some ways are worse since they give people a false sense of security.
Some good info. here:
https://medium.com/jennycohn1/what-is-the-latest-threat-to-democracy-ballot-marking-devices-a-k-a-electronic-pencils-16bb44917edd
Grasswire2
(13,849 posts)Her hair has been on fire for four years now.
HelpImSurrounded
(560 posts)...and there is still a lot to do but given where we were, just being able to pull out paper ballots and tally them against the machine is a vital step in the right direction.
diva77
(7,880 posts)emerges - make sure all the races are present and that the printed version displays your correct vote. Then if there is ever a "recount," demand that it be done by hand rather than just rerunning the paper thru a scanner -which will unfortunately only read the bar or QR code rather than the printed part. Spread the word widely!!
HelpImSurrounded
(560 posts)diva77
(7,880 posts)and their security problems.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100214279239#post4
Celerity
(54,448 posts)(all you need to do for Medium articles is to remove the @ in the url)
diva77
(7,880 posts)Ilsa
(64,386 posts)everyone I voted for and a QR code on it. Not sure what the code is for. My paper ballot was recorded as the 108th ballot at the location where I voted.
Rice4VP
(1,235 posts)not all of them were working on Election Day. Since 2017, we have had paper ballots that we scan into a machine