General Discussion

Mponti

(174 posts) Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:47 AM Sep 2012

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (Mponti) on Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:35 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) Mponti Sep 2012 OP

Let's do the the time warp, again! leveymg Sep 2012 #1

because there was no election in 2006 spanone Sep 2012 #2

She won't run in 2006 because her time machine is broken Champion Jack Sep 2012 #3

Is it broken already or will it has been broken yet in the past? Bucky Sep 2012 #12

No she will run in 2016 Missycim Sep 2012 #4

Because Paul Ryan has already gone back in time and foiled her plans. n/t porphyrian Sep 2012 #5

If she runs in 2006 Aerows Sep 2012 #6

Lol! RiffRandell Sep 2012 #14

She will. She decided to run retroactively. Happyhippychick Sep 2012 #7

He'd better fucking NOT appoint a 65+ year old ANYone to the Supreme Court! Gidney N Cloyd Sep 2012 #8

correct--we need young blood on the court. WI_DEM Sep 2012 #10

I love Hillary... NCTraveler Sep 2012 #11

I'll bet she won't run in 1996 either. nt valerief Sep 2012 #9

Well this surely got my attention BumRushDaShow Sep 2012 #13

First she has to go back to 1787 and change the election cycles for president Bucky Sep 2012 #15

Not only that, 2006 was six years ago. The fact that she didn't run proves that she won't. slackmaster Sep 2012 #16

You need to update your calendar. DCBob Sep 2012 #17

I once had a doctor who married a Latvian expatriate who had never been to school slackmaster Sep 2012 #18

HA! DCBob Sep 2012 #19

leveymg

(36,418 posts)

1. Let's do the the time warp, again!

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:48 AM

Sep 2012

It's a step to the Right . . .

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

spanone

(141,523 posts)

2. because there was no election in 2006

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:48 AM

Sep 2012

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Champion Jack

(5,378 posts)

3. She won't run in 2006 because her time machine is broken

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:49 AM

Sep 2012

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Bucky

(55,334 posts)

12. Is it broken already or will it has been broken yet in the past?

Reply to Champion Jack (Reply #3)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:03 AM

Sep 2012

Ouch. Time machine questions always hurt my head.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Missycim

(950 posts)

4. No she will run in 2016

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:50 AM

Sep 2012

she believes she is due and won't back down.

I am willing to bet a sawbuck to a favored charity that she will be named VP after Obama gets reelected.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

porphyrian

(18,530 posts)

5. Because Paul Ryan has already gone back in time and foiled her plans. n/t

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:51 AM

Sep 2012

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Aerows

(39,961 posts)

6. If she runs in 2006

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:53 AM

Sep 2012

She's even cooler than I thought she was. She can go back in TIME!

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)

14. Lol!

Reply to Aerows (Reply #6)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:05 AM

Sep 2012

I was thinking the same thing!

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Happyhippychick

(8,422 posts)

7. She will. She decided to run retroactively.

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:53 AM

Sep 2012

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,847 posts)

8. He'd better fucking NOT appoint a 65+ year old ANYone to the Supreme Court!

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:53 AM

Sep 2012

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)

10. correct--we need young blood on the court.

Reply to Gidney N Cloyd (Reply #8)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:55 AM

Sep 2012

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)

11. I love Hillary...

Reply to Gidney N Cloyd (Reply #8)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:00 AM

Sep 2012

and completely agree with you.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

valerief

(53,235 posts)

9. I'll bet she won't run in 1996 either. nt

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 08:54 AM

Sep 2012

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

BumRushDaShow

(169,310 posts)

13. Well this surely got my attention

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:05 AM

Sep 2012

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Bucky

(55,334 posts)

15. First she has to go back to 1787 and change the election cycles for president

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:07 AM

Sep 2012

Those damned Federalists will never elect another Clinton to the Constitutional Convention!! Hillary is a WINO*!

*[font size="1"](Whig in name only)[/font]

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)

16. Not only that, 2006 was six years ago. The fact that she didn't run proves that she won't.

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:07 AM

Sep 2012

It's already not happened.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

DCBob

(24,689 posts)

17. You need to update your calendar.

Reply to Mponti (Original post)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:08 AM

Sep 2012

or your keyboard.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)

18. I once had a doctor who married a Latvian expatriate who had never been to school

Reply to DCBob (Reply #17)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:22 AM

Sep 2012

She grew up so poor, she thought it would be a good idea to re-use calendars from one year to the next.

It was always tricky agreeing on a day for an appointment with him.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

DCBob

(24,689 posts)

19. HA!

Reply to slackmaster (Reply #18)

Fri Sep 28, 2012, 09:31 AM

Sep 2012

However I think the calendars repeat every 13 years so eventually it would be correct.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions