General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKatie Porter 'Strongly' Disagrees With Dianne Feinstein About The Coney Barrett Hearing
Many progressives were dismayed this week upon hearing Sen. Dianne Feinsteins (D-Calif.) heap praise on this weeks confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett, calling them one of the best set of hearings that Ive participated in.
The comments from the 87-year-old Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee ― accompanied by her embrace with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) afterward ― symbolized to progressives the partys inability to play hardball on court nominations and sparked an outcry among some groups who called for her removal from the panel.
She has undercut Democrats position at every step of this process, from undermining calls for filibuster and Court reform straight through to thanking Republicans for the most egregious partisan power grab in the modern history of the Supreme Court, said Brian Fallon, founder and executive director of Demand Justice, a progressive judicial advocacy group.
. . .
more at https://www.huffpost.com/entry/coney-barrett-feinstein-porter_n_5f89e3c4c5b69daf5e12efc5
babylonsister
(171,056 posts)Does she not have a clue what's at stake?
ananda
(28,858 posts)she and her husband are invested in
the defense industry.
Yavin4
(35,437 posts)Natural political skills right there. Take a lesson kids.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)BadgerMom
(2,770 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(11,591 posts)I also don't like that another Dem said this anonymously. If your going to call her senile have the guts to put your name to it. JMHO.
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)at least she has in my opinion.
Didn't her husband benefit financially from insider info about the early dangers of Covid? Something happened that was not quite right.
walkingman
(7,597 posts)Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(21,106 posts)Retrograde
(10,133 posts)who is also an old-school politician. Feinstein was OK during the Kavanaugh hearings, which is why I voted for her in 2018. This will be her last term if I have anything to say about it.
The California SoS website has lots of interesting maps of election results. What struck me about the 2018 senate primary was that Feinstein was first in every single county.
walkingman
(7,597 posts)candidate with a greater understanding of the world we find ourselves in today. I am very hopeful that with Biden we will have experience and a person of good character which is sorely needed. I do worry if we will move with aggression towards dealing with climate change, inequality, environment, good education, and a better social safety net. We simply do not have time to pussy foot around the issues anymore we need to be bold, especially if we are fortunate enough to control the senate.
Our children depend on us finally doing something about the issues instead of "getting along" and business as usual. I truly hope that this election will do that. The world is depending on our leadership.
Response to walkingman (Reply #5)
Post removed
madaboutharry
(40,208 posts)that the public doesnt know about.
Feinstein must have been losing the plot for awhile. She is 87. She shouldnt have run again at age 85. It was selfish.
She has always been too conservative and too friendly to republicans, IMO. She is a good person, no one is saying shes not. But there was a time for her to retire.
Both she and Grassley are very elderly. Grassley will be 87 on his next birthday and has said he may run for re-election in 2022. Someone needs to tell these folks NO.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)us outside of making some feel good. Highly likely shell get confirmed.
greyl
(22,990 posts)setting the stage for balancing the court.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)greyl
(22,990 posts)Weakening GOP Senate candidates, weakens GOP Senate candidates.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)greyl
(22,990 posts)Am I mistaken, or did you state that Katie Porter's statement of attitude wasn't helping us?
Hoyt: "Wouldn't get upset if Democrats ripped Barrett, but I don't think it helps us..."
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Barrett fine. It just doesn't help the situation. Sure, it makes some Democrats go, "That'll show them" as Barrett is confirmed. Not a big victory as far as I'm concerned.
Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)Ilsa
(61,694 posts)Leadership positions. As we approached the 2020 primaries, no wonder we had two and a half dozen people running for president. The middle aged Ds need a chance to shine for the party. We need to be constantly developing new leaders through Congress, etc.
world wide wally
(21,740 posts)djacq
(1,633 posts)Right after Vice President Kamala Harris.
applause 👏🏼 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
BadgerMom
(2,770 posts)Orange County is Republican. She has pulled off a miracle winning there. It means the residents of her district recognize an outstanding candidate. But her district might return to its Republican roots. Schiffs district, on the other hand, is true blue. If he were appointed to the Senate, his seat would remain in Democratic hands. Just a thought.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,585 posts)No chair, no committees, just floor votes.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)administered by a respected, nonpartisan, accredited panel of experts in the field. Supreme court and other lifetime judges, congresspeople and administration personnel up to and especially the president all need to be certified as having their cheese firmly on their crackers.
If that's offensive to the elderly, then fine, make everyone do it.
Why do we always have to live through a worst-case scenario before we fix problems we all knew were inevitably going to materialize?
Midnight Writer
(21,745 posts)Retrograde
(10,133 posts)in November - along with all the other D reps - and maybe turn a few more Congressional seats. With luck and a good turnout, Feinstein will be the next Senate Majority Leader's (and I hope it's not Schumer!) problem.
appmanga
(571 posts)This woman needs to be a senator from California. When Kamala leaves, or Feinstein is pushed out. Her sell-by date has long passed.