Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I was comparing Nate's forecast and aggregates to Biden's internal polls (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2020 OP
I have taken recent interest in a new forecaster GusBob Oct 2020 #1
Her latest updates appear to be over a month old Zeus69 Oct 2020 #2
Good question I dont know GusBob Oct 2020 #10
I read the article about Pollster methodology changing bucolic_frolic Oct 2020 #3
Why Can't They Random Dial Cellphones? ProfessorGAC Oct 2020 #4
From the context it's illegal, at least for pollsters. bucolic_frolic Oct 2020 #5
Ha! I Get All 3! ProfessorGAC Oct 2020 #6
Dunno. LE loves enforcing laws even if they make no sense. It's good for business. bucolic_frolic Oct 2020 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author helpisontheway Oct 2020 #8
You don't waste time generally calling GOP types, you call your own people and have their Demsrule86 Oct 2020 #9

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
1. I have taken recent interest in a new forecaster
Sun Oct 18, 2020, 12:03 PM
Oct 2020

Rachel Bitecofer she accurately predicted 2018 results

Her models are based on negative partinsonship = not voting for someone but against the other

GusBob

(7,286 posts)
10. Good question I dont know
Sun Oct 18, 2020, 02:30 PM
Oct 2020

I get the impression she is resting on her laurels a bit. Seems as if she made up her mind this past summer. She has hooked up with the Niskanen Center and the Lincoln Project
Doing podcasts and etc trying to build up her cred

She has a thing about hyper partinsonship in her methodology which makes sense these days

bucolic_frolic

(43,127 posts)
3. I read the article about Pollster methodology changing
Sun Oct 18, 2020, 12:25 PM
Oct 2020
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-pollsters-have-changed-since-2016-and-what-still-worries-them-about-2020/

What worries me is cell phones. OK, pollsters use them but can't random dial them, they use text polls in inner cities for cell phones. What about Trump's base? Rural, uneducated whites, tradesmen, often itinerant, who basically operate from a pickup truck and a cell phone, perhaps even a pay-as-you-go? They're all building houses and maintaining them. They don't answer the phone, they're working all day. There are legions of them. This could give Trump a 2% jolt in some states, and they may be missed by pollsters.

ProfessorGAC

(64,995 posts)
4. Why Can't They Random Dial Cellphones?
Sun Oct 18, 2020, 12:30 PM
Oct 2020

I get robocalls regularly, often for "expiration" of protection packages we've never had.

And, even if it were something in the past, I didn't get this number until I retired. Anything more than 22 months ago would have had the old, company cellphone number.

Seems pretty random, to me.

bucolic_frolic

(43,127 posts)
5. From the context it's illegal, at least for pollsters.
Sun Oct 18, 2020, 12:44 PM
Oct 2020

Those calls you get are from telemarketing operators who disguise their phone numbers or switch frequently.

I worked as a telemarketer very briefly. I wasn't very good at it. But there was one experienced guy who could make himself sound official at every point. He made a living from it.

"Attention! Attention! Your auto warranty is expiring!" or "This is your last chance to meet the deadline for expired healthcare!" or "Your utility has authorized us to save you MONEY!"

ProfessorGAC

(64,995 posts)
6. Ha! I Get All 3!
Sun Oct 18, 2020, 01:19 PM
Oct 2020

You described 90% of the nuisance calls I get.
Wouldn't it be hard to enforce the legal issue with pollsters who are ultimately providing a public service?

bucolic_frolic

(43,127 posts)
7. Dunno. LE loves enforcing laws even if they make no sense. It's good for business.
Sun Oct 18, 2020, 01:24 PM
Oct 2020

Oh, and many calls originate outside the U.S.

My landline is useless because 99% of calls are nuisance calls. I leave it off the hook.

Response to ProfessorGAC (Reply #4)

Demsrule86

(68,543 posts)
9. You don't waste time generally calling GOP types, you call your own people and have their
Sun Oct 18, 2020, 01:35 PM
Oct 2020

phone number usually.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I was comparing Nate's fo...