Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,055 posts)
Thu Oct 22, 2020, 11:12 AM Oct 2020

"It's absolutely horrible that the court managed to miss redacting the names of two female victims"



Tweet text:
julie k. brown
@jkbjournalist
It's absolutely horrible that the court managed to miss redacting the names of two female victims from this document, identifying a 14-year-old victim -- yet they spared all the men (including the names of lawyers!) from being identified...unbelievable!
7:58 AM · Oct 22, 2020
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"It's absolutely horrible that the court managed to miss redacting the names of two female victims" (Original Post) Nevilledog Oct 2020 OP
"Missed" TDale313 Oct 2020 #1
So, we do not get the names of the rapists? What good is this, then. LizBeth Oct 2020 #2
Not much from what I've read so far soothsayer Oct 2020 #3
Grrr Sherman A1 Oct 2020 #4

soothsayer

(38,601 posts)
3. Not much from what I've read so far
Thu Oct 22, 2020, 11:20 AM
Oct 2020

She can’t even say whether she was Epstein’s girlfriend. “That’s tricky,” she says.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"It's absolutely horrible...