Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"It's absolutely horrible that the court managed to miss redacting the names of two female victims"
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
julie k. brown
@jkbjournalist
It's absolutely horrible that the court managed to miss redacting the names of two female victims from this document, identifying a 14-year-old victim -- yet they spared all the men (including the names of lawyers!) from being identified...unbelievable!
7:58 AM · Oct 22, 2020
julie k. brown
@jkbjournalist
It's absolutely horrible that the court managed to miss redacting the names of two female victims from this document, identifying a 14-year-old victim -- yet they spared all the men (including the names of lawyers!) from being identified...unbelievable!
7:58 AM · Oct 22, 2020
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"It's absolutely horrible that the court managed to miss redacting the names of two female victims" (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Oct 2020
OP
TDale313
(7,822 posts)1. "Missed"
Yeah, right.
LizBeth
(11,222 posts)2. So, we do not get the names of the rapists? What good is this, then.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)3. Not much from what I've read so far
She cant even say whether she was Epsteins girlfriend. Thats tricky, she says.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)4. Grrr
