Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NPR re: NYPost "bombshell": "We don't want to waste our time on stories that are not really stories" (Original Post) sabra Oct 2020 OP
Great response from NPR! onetexan Oct 2020 #1
I would like to see media using stronger and more accurate language. spooky3 Oct 2020 #2
More accurate? TwilightZone Oct 2020 #5
The FBI has provided evidence of Russian misinformation. However, if that doesn't convince you spooky3 Oct 2020 #6
What's more accurate than "it's not a story"? TwilightZone Oct 2020 #7
We'll have to agree to disagree. nt spooky3 Oct 2020 #8
Exactly, they're calling it BS but saying it in a nice way, NPR style. onetexan Oct 2020 #9
Don't Worry NPR The River Oct 2020 #3
+1000 marybourg Oct 2020 #4

spooky3

(34,447 posts)
2. I would like to see media using stronger and more accurate language.
Thu Oct 22, 2020, 11:36 AM
Oct 2020

“Not really a story” could mean a lot of things. I’d prefer “we don’t publicize ‘stories’ with unsupported accusations and Russian misinformation.”

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
5. More accurate?
Thu Oct 22, 2020, 12:31 PM
Oct 2020

They shouldn't claim it's Russian misinformation unless they have evidence supporting the claim. Just like not reporting the "story" because they lack confirmation.

Doing otherwise would be a tad hypocritical.

spooky3

(34,447 posts)
6. The FBI has provided evidence of Russian misinformation. However, if that doesn't convince you
Thu Oct 22, 2020, 01:19 PM
Oct 2020

then you could reword it. The point is that the original story lacked evidence and offered baseless accusations against figures involved in a critical campaign. So a more accurate statement needs to be made, not merely "it's not a story" which is something that could be said about a story about the world's largest pumpkin in Farmer Jones' backyard.

On edit: intelligence officials called it out - they said "may" and that could be said by NPR. In any case, it's not simply "not a story." It's analogous to other outlets' not correctly labeling Trump's statements as "falsehoods" when they are.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/10/20/nation/dozens-former-intelligence-officials-sign-letter-warning-hunter-biden-story-could-be-russian-disinformation/

FBI's evidence:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/giuliani-biden-ukraine-russian-disinformation/2020/10/15/43158900-0ef5-11eb-b1e8-16b59b92b36d_story.html

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
7. What's more accurate than "it's not a story"?
Thu Oct 22, 2020, 01:23 PM
Oct 2020

Hey, guys, it's bullshit. Let's move on to something that actually is newsworthy.

That's their response, and I think it was perfectly appropriate. It doesn't get much clearer than that.

By the way, if you click on the link, NPR did exactly what you asked.

"There are many, many red flags in that New York Post investigation. NPR Media Correspondent David Folkenflik detailed most of them here. Intelligence officials warn that Russia has been working overtime to keep the story of Hunter Biden in the spotlight. Even if Russia can’t be positively connected to this information, the story of how Trump associates Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani came into a copy of this computer hard drive has not been verified and seems suspect. And if that story could be verified, the NY Post did no forensic work to convince consumers that the emails and photos that are the basis for their report have not been altered. "

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NPR re: NYPost "bombshell...