Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI read the WJS editorial and I don't see anything incriminating or devastating.
I am not quite sure what their game is here. It reminds me of tone. Anything said in a bad tone can be perceived as bad.
"Come here."
Said loudly, and tough, could be foreboding, right?
But a calm, "come here..." doesn't quite get the same reaction, right?
That's what this feels like. They're throwing a lot of junk at the wall and telling us it has to be bad but I see nothing in that article that either incriminates Joe or Hunter. Am I missing something?
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I read the WJS editorial and I don't see anything incriminating or devastating. (Original Post)
Drunken Irishman
Oct 2020
OP
Indykatie
(3,868 posts)1. ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)2. ################################################
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)3. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)4. (_8() D'Oh