Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts) Thu Oct 22, 2020, 08:41 PM Oct 2020

I read the WJS editorial and I don't see anything incriminating or devastating.

I am not quite sure what their game is here. It reminds me of tone. Anything said in a bad tone can be perceived as bad.

"Come here."

Said loudly, and tough, could be foreboding, right?

But a calm, "come here..." doesn't quite get the same reaction, right?

That's what this feels like. They're throwing a lot of junk at the wall and telling us it has to be bad but I see nothing in that article that either incriminates Joe or Hunter. Am I missing something?