General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumscatbyte
(38,840 posts)Initech
(107,981 posts)Claustrum
(5,056 posts)Wounded Bear
(63,980 posts)She's a bit like Suzie in Maine when it comes to integrity.
captain queeg
(11,780 posts)I think the Rs take turns pretending to have a spine once in awhile when they know its a meaningless gesture.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)No surprise.
W_HAMILTON
(10,238 posts)dlk
(13,183 posts)Yavin4
(37,182 posts)I voted against it before I voted for it?
Laelth
(32,017 posts)Voting against cloture means voting FOR keeping the debate open (i.e. voting to allow a filibuster of the nomination).
Voting FOR the nominee is obvious in its meaning, if thats what she said, but there will be no vote on this nominee unless Republicans pass a cloture motion (closing debate), and if Murkowski votes against cloture, that actually helps those of us who oppose this nominee.
-Laelth
unblock
(56,081 posts)Here she actually sided with democrats and did what we wanted her to do, even if it's only because they knew republicans had the votes they needed without her.
So we should be cynical of her show vote, but not (yet) angry for the (incorrect) reason cited.
ETA: well, maybe we can be angry. It's just that the op tweet cited the wrong thing:
https://news.yahoo.com/senate-gop-marches-ahead-barrett-041337208.html
rsdsharp
(11,866 posts)Is she voting for both or just for cloture?
We've seen this before. Same ole playbook
torius
(1,652 posts)Alaskans who put you in office for your phony reasonableness wont forget.
