Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Here's how you know the GOP is asking the Supreme Court to rerun Bush v. Gore"
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
Sasha Samberg-Champion
@ssamcham
Here's how you know the GOP is asking the Supreme Court to rerun Bush v. Gore: just look at the table of authorities.
Image
Zoe Tillman
@ZoeTillman
Replying to @ZoeTillman
- The PA Republican Party has now asked the PA Supreme Court to stay its decision re: the Nov. 6 deadline while it pursues a cert petition at SCOTUS (recall the last round was about an emergency stay application): https://scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Application-for-Relief.pdf-1.pdf
(HT to @SCOTUSblog for posting the docs)
6:43 PM · Oct 24, 2020
That's a lot of reliance on a decision that purportedly has no precedential authority.
Bush v. Gore used to be a little embarrassing for GOP lawyers and judges (and Justices!). Everyone knew it was just results-oriented decision. Now they're leaning all the way in and asking SCOTUS to say "Actually, Bush v. Gore establishes a doctrine and should be extended."
7:18 PM · Oct 24, 2020
Sasha Samberg-Champion
@ssamcham
Here's how you know the GOP is asking the Supreme Court to rerun Bush v. Gore: just look at the table of authorities.
Image
Zoe Tillman
@ZoeTillman
Replying to @ZoeTillman
- The PA Republican Party has now asked the PA Supreme Court to stay its decision re: the Nov. 6 deadline while it pursues a cert petition at SCOTUS (recall the last round was about an emergency stay application): https://scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Application-for-Relief.pdf-1.pdf
(HT to @SCOTUSblog for posting the docs)
6:43 PM · Oct 24, 2020
That's a lot of reliance on a decision that purportedly has no precedential authority.
Bush v. Gore used to be a little embarrassing for GOP lawyers and judges (and Justices!). Everyone knew it was just results-oriented decision. Now they're leaning all the way in and asking SCOTUS to say "Actually, Bush v. Gore establishes a doctrine and should be extended."
7:18 PM · Oct 24, 2020
What does Passim mean in a legal brief?
Latin, "scattered" or "spread throughout." The term is used synonymously with "here and there" to indicate that the materials cited or referenced can be found throughout the indicated source. Passim has been replaced with the signal see generally in modern legal writing.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 1350 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Here's how you know the GOP is asking the Supreme Court to rerun Bush v. Gore" (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Oct 2020
OP
They meant that in the same way that McTurdle said the American people deserve a voice....
lastlib
Oct 2020
#9
with a 15 million vote margin and 380 electoral votes, the SC will not be involved
beachbumbob
Oct 2020
#3
I get 271 to 269 With Wisconsin, Michigan, and Florida hacked by Russians or others via insecure
mahina
Oct 2020
#5
Vote tabulators are not connected to the internet like voter registration info is. Nt
Fiendish Thingy
Oct 2020
#11
Jim__
(14,074 posts)1. IIRC Bush v Gore explicitly states that it cannot be cited as a precedent.
I'm not sure if what they're doing is citing it as a precedent, but if not, it's surely a close relative.
Nevilledog
(51,069 posts)4. That was before. They operate in a different reality.
dalton99a
(81,443 posts)6. Their motto: "What Are You Gonna Do About It?"
lastlib
(23,208 posts)9. They meant that in the same way that McTurdle said the American people deserve a voice....
...in selecting a SCOTUS Justice.
See also Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland, to wit, "a word means exactly what I intend it to mean, nothing more, nothing less."
Kid Berwyn
(14,870 posts)2. IOKIARDI
Like taxes, the law only applies to little people.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)3. with a 15 million vote margin and 380 electoral votes, the SC will not be involved
mahina
(17,642 posts)5. I get 271 to 269 With Wisconsin, Michigan, and Florida hacked by Russians or others via insecure
Modems
But I hope you are right.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)8. to many paper trails to hack the number of votes, least of the concerns
Fiendish Thingy
(15,570 posts)11. Vote tabulators are not connected to the internet like voter registration info is. Nt
Fiendish Thingy
(15,570 posts)7. Bush v Gore does not apply, and cannot be enforced
Just like Andrew Jackson said, you and what Army? Would stop a governor from appointing the appropriate slate of electors to send to congress?
Thekaspervote
(32,754 posts)10. Aw ha!! The Sunday morning voice of sanity...thank you!